From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:34:06 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v7 04/11] ARM: pxa: rename gpio_to_irq and irq_to_gpio In-Reply-To: <20111114103225.GB25150@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1320806851-13928-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@marvell.com> <1320806851-13928-5-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@marvell.com> <20111114100939.GA25150@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20111114103225.GB25150@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 06:28:23PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:47:24AM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote: >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x2xx-pci.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x2xx-pci.c >> >> index ebd9259..e79e081 100644 >> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x2xx-pci.c >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cm-x2xx-pci.c >> >> @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ void __cmx2xx_pci_init_irq(int irq_gpio) >> >> >> >> ? ? ? cmx2xx_it8152_irq_gpio = irq_gpio; >> >> >> >> - ? ? irq_set_irq_type(gpio_to_irq(irq_gpio), IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING); >> >> + ? ? irq_set_irq_type(PXA_GPIO_TO_IRQ(irq_gpio), IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING); >> >> >> >> - ? ? irq_set_chained_handler(gpio_to_irq(irq_gpio), >> >> + ? ? irq_set_chained_handler(PXA_GPIO_TO_IRQ(irq_gpio), >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cmx2xx_it8152_irq_demux); >> > >> > The only comment remaining from the previous review of these patches is >> > that these changes to the runtime usage of gpio_to_irq() should not be >> > necessary. >> > >> > If gpiolib is implemented correctly, when running on PXA, >> > PXA_GPIO_TO_IRQ(gpio) should be the same as gpio_to_irq(gpio). >> > >> >> Yes, it seems that this patch is unnecessary. So will you merge rest >> of those gpio patches into your git tree? > > Some of this patch is required - all the places where gpio_to_irq() is > used as an initializer need to be fixed. ?Those places where it is used > at run-time should not be fixed up though. > OK. I'll submit a new patch series again. Thanks Haojian