[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[Tyler Baker]

Call spin_lock_init() before the spinlocks are used, preventing a lockdep
splat.

I have been observing lockdep complaining [1] during boot on my a80 optimus [2]
when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING has been enabled. This patch resolves the splat,
and has been tested on a few other sunxi platforms without issue.

[1] http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150107/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-tbaker/boot-sun9i-a80-optimus.html
[2] http://kernelci.org/boot/?a80-optimus

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
---
This patch was tested on 3.19.0-rc3 

 drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
index eebc52c..e37250c 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
@@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ static int sunxi_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(data->membase))
 		return PTR_ERR(data->membase);
 
+	spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
+
 	data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
 	data->rcdev.nr_resets = resource_size(res) * 32;
 	data->rcdev.ops = &sunxi_reset_ops;
-- 
2.1.3

[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[Philipp Zabel]

Hi Tyler,

Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2015, 16:54 -0800 schrieb Tyler Baker:
> Call spin_lock_init() before the spinlocks are used, preventing a lockdep
> splat.
>
> I have been observing lockdep complaining [1] during boot on my a80 optimus [2]
> when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING has been enabled. This patch resolves the splat,
> and has been tested on a few other sunxi platforms without issue.
> 
> [1] http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150107/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-tbaker/boot-sun9i-a80-optimus.html
> [2] http://kernelci.org/boot/?a80-optimus
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
> ---
> This patch was tested on 3.19.0-rc3 

Applied, thanks!

regards
Philipp

[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi Tyler,

On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:54:39PM -0800, Tyler Baker wrote:
> Call spin_lock_init() before the spinlocks are used, preventing a lockdep
> splat.
> 
> I have been observing lockdep complaining [1] during boot on my a80 optimus [2]
> when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING has been enabled. This patch resolves the splat,
> and has been tested on a few other sunxi platforms without issue.
> 
> [1] http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150107/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-tbaker/boot-sun9i-a80-optimus.html
> [2] http://kernelci.org/boot/?a80-optimus
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>

Thanks for this patch.

Can you send this to stable too please?

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150108/f5474105/attachment.sig>

[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[Tyler Baker]

Hi Maxime,

On 8 January 2015 at 01:30, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:54:39PM -0800, Tyler Baker wrote:
>> Call spin_lock_init() before the spinlocks are used, preventing a lockdep
>> splat.
>>
>> I have been observing lockdep complaining [1] during boot on my a80 optimus [2]
>> when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING has been enabled. This patch resolves the splat,
>> and has been tested on a few other sunxi platforms without issue.
>>
>> [1] http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150107/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-tbaker/boot-sun9i-a80-optimus.html
>> [2] http://kernelci.org/boot/?a80-optimus
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
>
> Thanks for this patch.

You're welcome.

>
> Can you send this to stable too please?

Sure. Once it has been merged in Linus' tree I'll send it for -stable review.

>
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com

Cheers,

-- 
Tyler Baker
Tech Lead, LAVA
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[Maxime Coquelin]

Hi Tyler, Maxime,

On 01/08/2015 01:54 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
> Call spin_lock_init() before the spinlocks are used, preventing a lockdep
> splat.
>
> I have been observing lockdep complaining [1] during boot on my a80 optimus [2]
> when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING has been enabled. This patch resolves the splat,
> and has been tested on a few other sunxi platforms without issue.
>
> [1] http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150107/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-tbaker/boot-sun9i-a80-optimus.html
> [2] http://kernelci.org/boot/?a80-optimus
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
> ---
> This patch was tested on 3.19.0-rc3
>
>   drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
> index eebc52c..e37250c 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ static int sunxi_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (IS_ERR(data->membase))
>   		return PTR_ERR(data->membase);
>   
> +	spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
> +
Shouldn't the lock be initialized also in early init function 
(sunxi_reset_init) ?

Regards,
Maxime
>   	data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>   	data->rcdev.nr_resets = resource_size(res) * 32;
>   	data->rcdev.ops = &sunxi_reset_ops;

[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[Maxime Coquelin]

With Maxime in the To: list.


On 01/09/2015 12:59 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Tyler, Maxime,
>
> On 01/08/2015 01:54 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
>> Call spin_lock_init() before the spinlocks are used, preventing a 
>> lockdep
>> splat.
>>
>> I have been observing lockdep complaining [1] during boot on my a80 
>> optimus [2]
>> when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING has been enabled. This patch resolves the 
>> splat,
>> and has been tested on a few other sunxi platforms without issue.
>>
>> [1] 
>> http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150107/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-tbaker/boot-sun9i-a80-optimus.html
>> [2] http://kernelci.org/boot/?a80-optimus
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> This patch was tested on 3.19.0-rc3
>>
>>   drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>> index eebc52c..e37250c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>> @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ static int sunxi_reset_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       if (IS_ERR(data->membase))
>>           return PTR_ERR(data->membase);
>>   +    spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
>> +
> Shouldn't the lock be initialized also in early init function 
> (sunxi_reset_init) ?
>
> Regards,
> Maxime
>>       data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>       data->rcdev.nr_resets = resource_size(res) * 32;
>>       data->rcdev.ops = &sunxi_reset_ops;
>

[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[Tyler Baker]

Hi Maxime,

On 9 January 2015 at 06:44, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> wrote:
> With Maxime in the To: list.
>
>
>
> On 01/09/2015 12:59 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tyler, Maxime,
>>
>> On 01/08/2015 01:54 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
>>>
>>> Call spin_lock_init() before the spinlocks are used, preventing a lockdep
>>> splat.
>>>
>>> I have been observing lockdep complaining [1] during boot on my a80
>>> optimus [2]
>>> when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING has been enabled. This patch resolves the
>>> splat,
>>> and has been tested on a few other sunxi platforms without issue.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150107/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-tbaker/boot-sun9i-a80-optimus.html
>>> [2] http://kernelci.org/boot/?a80-optimus
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> This patch was tested on 3.19.0-rc3
>>>
>>>   drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c | 2 ++
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>>> index eebc52c..e37250c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>>> @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ static int sunxi_reset_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>>       if (IS_ERR(data->membase))
>>>           return PTR_ERR(data->membase);
>>>   +    spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
>>> +
>>
>> Shouldn't the lock be initialized also in early init function
>> (sunxi_reset_init) ?

Thanks for pointing this out. It seems reasonable to me to add this
for the sun6i platforms that use the early init function. Currently
trying to track down a sun6i platform so I can run a few locking
validation tests.

>>
>> Regards,
>> Maxime
>>>
>>>       data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>>       data->rcdev.nr_resets = resource_size(res) * 32;
>>>       data->rcdev.ops = &sunxi_reset_ops;
>>
>>
>



-- 
Tyler Baker
Tech Lead, LAVA
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[Tyler Baker]

On 9 January 2015 at 12:44, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On 9 January 2015 at 06:44, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> wrote:
>> With Maxime in the To: list.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/09/2015 12:59 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Tyler, Maxime,
>>>
>>> On 01/08/2015 01:54 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Call spin_lock_init() before the spinlocks are used, preventing a lockdep
>>>> splat.
>>>>
>>>> I have been observing lockdep complaining [1] during boot on my a80
>>>> optimus [2]
>>>> when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING has been enabled. This patch resolves the
>>>> splat,
>>>> and has been tested on a few other sunxi platforms without issue.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150107/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-tbaker/boot-sun9i-a80-optimus.html
>>>> [2] http://kernelci.org/boot/?a80-optimus
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> This patch was tested on 3.19.0-rc3
>>>>
>>>>   drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c | 2 ++
>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>>>> index eebc52c..e37250c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>>>> @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ static int sunxi_reset_probe(struct platform_device
>>>> *pdev)
>>>>       if (IS_ERR(data->membase))
>>>>           return PTR_ERR(data->membase);
>>>>   +    spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Shouldn't the lock be initialized also in early init function
>>> (sunxi_reset_init) ?
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. It seems reasonable to me to add this
> for the sun6i platforms that use the early init function. Currently
> trying to track down a sun6i platform so I can run a few locking
> validation tests.

Olof was kind enough to volunteer his sun6i platform (colombus) and
provide the results. The results confirms there is a need to also
initialize the lock in sunxi_reset_init as Maxime C. mentioned.

DEBUG: sunxi_reset_init()
DEBUG: sunxi_reset_deassert()
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc3-00039-gccd0de2-dirty #5
Hardware name: Allwinner sun6i (A31) Family
[<c021679c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0212140>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c0212140>] (show_stack) from [<c09557c4>] (dump_stack+0x8c/0x9c)
[<c09557c4>] (dump_stack) from [<c028293c>] (__lock_acquire+0x1ef4/0x1f00)
[<c028293c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c028311c>] (lock_acquire+0x6c/0x8c)
[<c028311c>] (lock_acquire) from [<c095b810>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3c/0x50)
[<c095b810>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c0542d80>]
(sunxi_reset_deassert+0x2c/0x88)
[<c0542d80>] (sunxi_reset_deassert) from [<c0d39a00>]
(sun5i_timer_init+0xc0/0x1f0)
[<c0d39a00>] (sun5i_timer_init) from [<c0d3897c>]
(clocksource_of_init+0x4c/0x8c)
[<c0d3897c>] (clocksource_of_init) from [<c0cf0b34>] (start_kernel+0x278/0x3c8)
[<c0cf0b34>] (start_kernel) from [<40208074>] (0x40208074)

I'll go ahead and resend an updated patch and cc stable if Philipp and
Maxime R. they agree.

>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Maxime
>>>>
>>>>       data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>>>       data->rcdev.nr_resets = resource_size(res) * 32;
>>>>       data->rcdev.ops = &sunxi_reset_ops;
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tyler Baker
> Tech Lead, LAVA
> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
> http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

Cheers,

-- 
Tyler Baker
Tech Lead, LAVA
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[Philipp Zabel]

Hi Tyler,

Am Freitag, den 09.01.2015, 16:22 -0800 schrieb Tyler Baker:
> I'll go ahead and resend an updated patch and cc stable if Philipp and
> Maxime R. they agree.

Please do.

thanks
Philipp

[PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization

[Maxime Coquelin]

Hi Tyler,

On 01/10/2015 01:22 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
> On 9 January 2015 at 12:44, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi Maxime,
>>
>> On 9 January 2015 at 06:44, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com> wrote:
>>> With Maxime in the To: list.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/09/2015 12:59 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>>> Hi Tyler, Maxime,
>>>>
>>>> On 01/08/2015 01:54 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
>>>>> Call spin_lock_init() before the spinlocks are used, preventing a lockdep
>>>>> splat.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been observing lockdep complaining [1] during boot on my a80
>>>>> optimus [2]
>>>>> when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING has been enabled. This patch resolves the
>>>>> splat,
>>>>> and has been tested on a few other sunxi platforms without issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150107/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-tbaker/boot-sun9i-a80-optimus.html
>>>>> [2] http://kernelci.org/boot/?a80-optimus
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This patch was tested on 3.19.0-rc3
>>>>>
>>>>>    drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c | 2 ++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>>>>> index eebc52c..e37250c 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>>>>> @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ static int sunxi_reset_probe(struct platform_device
>>>>> *pdev)
>>>>>        if (IS_ERR(data->membase))
>>>>>            return PTR_ERR(data->membase);
>>>>>    +    spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
>>>>> +
>>>> Shouldn't the lock be initialized also in early init function
>>>> (sunxi_reset_init) ?
>> Thanks for pointing this out. It seems reasonable to me to add this
>> for the sun6i platforms that use the early init function. Currently
>> trying to track down a sun6i platform so I can run a few locking
>> validation tests.
> Olof was kind enough to volunteer his sun6i platform (colombus) and
> provide the results. The results confirms there is a need to also
> initialize the lock in sunxi_reset_init as Maxime C. mentioned.
>
> DEBUG: sunxi_reset_init()
> DEBUG: sunxi_reset_deassert()
> INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> turning off the locking correctness validator.
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc3-00039-gccd0de2-dirty #5
> Hardware name: Allwinner sun6i (A31) Family
> [<c021679c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0212140>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [<c0212140>] (show_stack) from [<c09557c4>] (dump_stack+0x8c/0x9c)
> [<c09557c4>] (dump_stack) from [<c028293c>] (__lock_acquire+0x1ef4/0x1f00)
> [<c028293c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c028311c>] (lock_acquire+0x6c/0x8c)
> [<c028311c>] (lock_acquire) from [<c095b810>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3c/0x50)
> [<c095b810>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c0542d80>]
> (sunxi_reset_deassert+0x2c/0x88)
> [<c0542d80>] (sunxi_reset_deassert) from [<c0d39a00>]
> (sun5i_timer_init+0xc0/0x1f0)
> [<c0d39a00>] (sun5i_timer_init) from [<c0d3897c>]
> (clocksource_of_init+0x4c/0x8c)
> [<c0d3897c>] (clocksource_of_init) from [<c0cf0b34>] (start_kernel+0x278/0x3c8)
> [<c0cf0b34>] (start_kernel) from [<40208074>] (0x40208074)
>
> I'll go ahead and resend an updated patch and cc stable if Philipp and
> Maxime R. they agree.

Thanks for having done the test.
I have no Allwinner HW to try.

Best regards,
Maxime
>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Maxime
>>>>>        data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>>>>        data->rcdev.nr_resets = resource_size(res) * 32;
>>>>>        data->rcdev.ops = &sunxi_reset_ops;
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tyler Baker
>> Tech Lead, LAVA
>> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
>> Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
>> http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
> Cheers,
>