linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: net147@gmail.com (Jonathan Liu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] usb: musb: sunxi: Explicitly release USB PHY on exit
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:43:51 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANwerB26bBmP2gyr3JcsvLH6SDyfM4t9i1j9W7YFMtx81r4HyQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171010021439.GH12182@LTA0271908.dhcp.ti.com>

Hi,

On 10 October 2017 at 13:14, Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:17:34AM +1100, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10 October 2017 at 01:23, Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:39:23PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>> >> This fixes a kernel oops when unloading the driver due to usb_put_phy
>> >> being called after usb_phy_generic_unregister when the device is
>> >> detached. Calling usb_phy_generic_unregister causes x->dev->driver to
>> >> be NULL in usb_put_phy and results in a NULL pointer dereference.
>> >>
>> >> As we are now explicitly managing the lifetime of usb_phy,
>> >> devm_usb_get_phy is changed to usb_get_phy and we call usb_put_phy in
>> >> the probe error path.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org # v4.3+
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/usb/musb/sunxi.c | 8 ++++++--
>> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/sunxi.c b/drivers/usb/musb/sunxi.c
>> >> index c9a09b5bb6e5..8eed61042103 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/sunxi.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/sunxi.c
>> >> @@ -297,6 +297,8 @@ static int sunxi_musb_exit(struct musb *musb)
>> >>       if (test_bit(SUNXI_MUSB_FL_HAS_SRAM, &glue->flags))
>> >>               sunxi_sram_release(musb->controller->parent);
>> >>
>> >> +     usb_put_phy(glue->xceiv);
>> >
>> > Will devm_usb_put_phy() solve the issue too? Then you don't need the
>> > changes in sunxi_musb_probe() below.
>> >
>>
>> devm_usb_put_phy does solve the issue without changes in
>> sunxi_musb_probe but I think it is clearer that the lifetime is
>> explicitly managed if we don't mix implicit and explicit freeing of
>> resources.
>
> Then what is the purpose of the devm_* API?
>
> The original bug was that devm_usb_get_phy() is called in _probe, but
> devm_usb_put_phy() was never called, which caused the device ref count
> unbalanced. It is not related to implicit/explicit resource management.
>
> devm_* is recommended whenever applicable.
>

Ok. Will use devm_usb_put_phy in v2 patch.

> Regards,
> -Bin.
>

Regards,
Jonathan

      reply	other threads:[~2017-10-10  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-26 11:39 [PATCH] usb: musb: sunxi: Explicitly release USB PHY on exit Jonathan Liu
2017-09-26 11:42 ` Jonathan Liu
2017-10-09 14:23 ` Bin Liu
2017-10-09 21:17   ` Jonathan Liu
2017-10-10  2:14     ` Bin Liu
2017-10-10  2:43       ` Jonathan Liu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANwerB26bBmP2gyr3JcsvLH6SDyfM4t9i1j9W7YFMtx81r4HyQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=net147@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).