From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: festevam@gmail.com (Fabio Estevam)
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:40:00 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6ull: keep IMX6UL_ prefix for signals on
 both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL
In-Reply-To: <20180720102321.23291-1-sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
References: <20180720102321.23291-1-sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5BMCD8EYFMSuWFyzEOO5L7hgHLfaZ2Hi41Q4X30w21whA@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:23 AM, S?bastien Szymanski
<sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com> wrote:
> Signals available on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL should have the same name
> because it is the case of all others common signals, it avoids to make
> mistakes (use the wrong ones) and it makes writing device tree files
> less complicated. For example:
>
> imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi:
>  ...
>  pinctrl_uart5: uart5grp {
>         fsl,pins = <
>                 MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DCE_TX   0x1b0b1
>                 MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX   0x1b0b1
>          >;
>  };
>
> imx6ul-board.dts:
>  #include <imx6ul.dtsi>
>  #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
>  ...
>
> imx6ull-board.dts:
>  #include <imx6ull.dtsi>
>  #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
>  ...
>
> Without this patch, the imx6ull-board.dtb will use
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX instead of
> MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX and the uart5 will be
> misconfigured.
>
> Signed-off-by: S?bastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>

Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>