From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: festevam@gmail.com (Fabio Estevam) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 20:22:16 -0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc: Use consistent naming for eSDHC In-Reply-To: <20180131213544.4508-1-benoit.thebaudeau.dev@gmail.com> References: <20180131213544.4508-1-benoit.thebaudeau.dev@gmail.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote: > This file had several naming inconsistencies for eSDHC: > - the instances were named sometimes SDn, sometimes SDHCn, whereas they > are named ESDHCn in the reference manual, e.g.: > MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__SD1_CMD > MX25_PAD_D15__SDHC1_DAT7 > - the data ports were named sometimes DATAn, sometimes DATn like in the > reference manual, e.g.: > MX25_PAD_SD1_DATA0__SD1_DATA0 > MX25_PAD_D15__SDHC1_DAT7 > - in one case, the clock port was named DAT_CLK instead of CLK: > MX25_PAD_CSI_D7__SDHC2_DAT_CLK > > This change: > - introduces new definitions using the naming from the reference > manual, > - keeps definitions using the legacy naming in order not to break > compatibility for out-of-tree users (they can be removed later), > - updates the in-tree files that were using the legacy naming. > > Cc: Uwe Kleine-K?nig > Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam