From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] firmware: xilinx: Add zynqmp IOCTL API for device control
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:48:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMhEcMB4caAPtCSq-m5zQBDc-8Z4f_xAkomnEwVaHyX2Mw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1537985581-32164-3-git-send-email-jollys@xilinx.com>
Hi,
Just nits on code readability below. Approach looks OK to me.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:13 AM Jolly Shah <jolly.shah@xilinx.com> wrote:
>
> From: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@xilinx.com>
>
> Add ZynqMP firmware IOCTL API to control and configure
> devices like PLLs, SD, Gem, etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jolly Shah <jollys@xilinx.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> index 84b3fd2..671a37a 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> @@ -428,6 +428,48 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_clock_getparent(u32 clock_id, u32 *parent_id)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_is_valid_ioctl() - Check whether IOCTL ID is valid or not
> + * @ioctl_id: IOCTL ID
> + *
> + * Return: 0 if IOCTL is valid, else -EINVAL
> + */
> +static inline int zynqmp_is_valid_ioctl(u32 ioctl_id)
I think most who come across the use of this would expect an
.*is_valid() to return true (non-0) when valid, and 0 otherwise.
> +{
> + if (ioctl_id == IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_MODE ||
> + ioctl_id == IOCTL_GET_PLL_FRAC_MODE ||
> + ioctl_id == IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_DATA ||
> + ioctl_id == IOCTL_GET_PLL_FRAC_DATA)
> + return 0;
This is purely a matter of taste, and no requirement to change, but I
find a switch slightly easier to read for this kind of usage:
switch(ioctl_id) {
case IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_MODE:
case IOCTL_GET_PLL_FRAC_MODE:
case IOCTL_SET_PLL_FRAC_DATA:
case IOCTL_GET_PLL_FRAC_DATA:
return 1;
default:
return 0;
}
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * zynqmp_pm_ioctl() - PM IOCTL API for device control and configs
> + * @node_id: Node ID of the device
> + * @ioctl_id: ID of the requested IOCTL
> + * @arg1: Argument 1 to requested IOCTL call
> + * @arg2: Argument 2 to requested IOCTL call
> + * @out: Returned output value
> + *
> + * This function calls IOCTL to firmware for device control and configuration.
> + *
> + * Return: Returns status, either success or error+reason
> + */
> +static int zynqmp_pm_ioctl(u32 node_id, u32 ioctl_id, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
> + u32 *out)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = zynqmp_is_valid_ioctl(ioctl_id);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
So with changed return values, this would turn into:
if (!zynqmp_is_valid_ioctl(ioctl_id))
return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return zynqmp_pm_invoke_fn(PM_IOCTL, node_id, ioctl_id,
> + arg1, arg2, out);
> +}
> +
> static const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops eemi_ops = {
> .get_api_version = zynqmp_pm_get_api_version,
> .query_data = zynqmp_pm_query_data,
> @@ -440,6 +482,7 @@ static const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops eemi_ops = {
> .clock_getrate = zynqmp_pm_clock_getrate,
> .clock_setparent = zynqmp_pm_clock_setparent,
> .clock_getparent = zynqmp_pm_clock_getparent,
> + .ioctl = zynqmp_pm_ioctl,
> };
>
> /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h b/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
> index 015e130..7a9db08 100644
> --- a/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,8 @@
>
> enum pm_api_id {
> PM_GET_API_VERSION = 1,
> - PM_QUERY_DATA = 35,
> + PM_IOCTL = 34,
> + PM_QUERY_DATA,
> PM_CLOCK_ENABLE,
> PM_CLOCK_DISABLE,
> PM_CLOCK_GETSTATE,
> @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ struct zynqmp_eemi_ops {
> int (*clock_getrate)(u32 clock_id, u64 *rate);
> int (*clock_setparent)(u32 clock_id, u32 parent_id);
> int (*clock_getparent)(u32 clock_id, u32 *parent_id);
> + int (*ioctl)(u32 node_id, u32 ioctl_id, u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 *out);
> };
>
> #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-26 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-26 18:12 [PATCH v3 0/4] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver support Jolly Shah
2018-09-26 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Documentation: xilinx: Add documentation for eemi APIs Jolly Shah
2018-09-26 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] firmware: xilinx: Add zynqmp IOCTL API for device control Jolly Shah
2018-09-26 20:48 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2018-09-28 17:15 ` Jolly Shah
2018-09-28 21:12 ` Olof Johansson
2018-10-01 13:17 ` Michal Simek
2018-10-01 17:26 ` Olof Johansson
2018-10-02 10:53 ` Michal Simek
2018-09-26 18:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add bindings for ZynqMP clock driver Jolly Shah
2018-09-26 18:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drivers: clk: Add " Jolly Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOesGMhEcMB4caAPtCSq-m5zQBDc-8Z4f_xAkomnEwVaHyX2Mw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).