From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br (Otavio Salvador) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:34:52 -0300 Subject: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula In-Reply-To: References: <03B5A3CA1724CE4EAC32B27E39292A677FC5A390AE@AUSMAIL1.AUS.ADVANTECH.CORP> <03B5A3CA1724CE4EAC32B27E39292A677FC5A39613@AUSMAIL1.AUS.ADVANTECH.CORP> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Ken, > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ken.Lin wrote: > >> With the patches applied, the pixel clock (148500000 required for 1920x1080 at 60) is correct as we checked in kernel 4.7 and the actual measurement result looked good as we expected. >> I think the patches should fix the issue. > > That's good news. Thanks for testing. > > Emil is working on a v3 version of the patch series. > > Emil, > > Please add Ken Lin on Cc when you submit v3. And what will be done regarding 4.8? Is the faulty change to be reverted or this patches will be backported? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750