From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: xerofoify@gmail.com (Nick Krause) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:56:00 -0400 Subject: mach-shmobile: FIXME message in file pm-sh732.c In-Reply-To: <20140711154443.GD1777@verge.net.au> References: <20140711093450.GA26660@verge.net.au> <20140711154443.GD1777@verge.net.au> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Nick Krause wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Simon Horman wrote: >> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:34:58AM -0400, Nick Krause wrote: >> >> While searching for FIX ME messages when using cscope on the latest kernels I >> >> get a message on 68 of this file and was wondering what I need to define SMFRAM >> >> as in order for it to point to things needed to support this portion >> >> of the hardware. >> > >> > Hi Nick, >> > >> > while I don't have a technical answer to your question I do believe >> > that the code in question will be removed in the not too distant future >> > along with support for the sh7372 SoC. >> >> Why are we removing support for this SoC? Is there any reason? > > Because it is rather old hardware which is most likely not used against > mainline by anyone other than those maintaining the code and moving it over > to use multiplatform, CCF, and the like appears to be more work thank it is > worth. That's fine, you can remove it then. I was just curious. Cheers Nick