From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ulf.hansson@linaro.org (Ulf Hansson) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:29:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Provide option for clk_get_rate to issue hw for new rate In-Reply-To: References: <1346415691-13371-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <1346415691-13371-2-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <20120831192906.31162.97714@nucleus> <20120907001927.20289.41627@nucleus> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 7 September 2012 10:21, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Turquette, Mike wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: >>> I'll take this series into clk-next. >> >> Oops, I forgot to ask about patch #3. Which tree do you want that to >> go through? > > Just take it all through your tree if there are no major conflicts. > Acked-by etc. Agree, it makes it simpler to go through Mike's clock tree. At least let's try it out. I will likely have similar patch series with cross dependencies later on, so this can be a good first test and hopefully it works. Although, don't we need an ack by Samuel Ortiz for the patch on mfd? "mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock" Or, is it enough with Linus ack since he is the maintainer of that specific mfd file I have patched? Kind regards Ulf Hansson