From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Fix notifier documentation
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:01:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPtuhTj7QmB-xFU40x_MCvbvo07M2_2sDfiOQNkf4oEGFPKiOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57c43634-23a6-4dcf-8aff-f49961d7f4d6@TX2EHSMHS005.ehs.local>
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:49 PM, S?ren Brinkmann
<soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
> ping?
Hi Soren,
I'm a bit slow to review patches during the merge window. Thanks for
the doc update. I'll take it in after -rc1 drops.
Regards,
Mik
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:48:37AM -0800, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
>> Contradicting to documenation, the notifier callbacks do receive
>> the original clock rate in struct clk_notifier_data.old_rate and the new
>> frequency struct clk_notifier_data.new_rate, independent of the
>> notification reason.
>>
>> This behavior also seems to make more sense, since callbacks can use the
>> same code to deterimine whether clocks are scaled up or down. Something
>> which would not even possible in the post-rate-change case if the
>> behavior was as documented.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
>> ---
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I am working with some clock notifiers and if my results are correct the
>> notifiers behave differently from how they are documented.
>> I think the actual behavior makes more sense than the documented and my original
>> plan was to change the behavior, but it seems I might get away with a
>> doc-update.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> S?ren
>>
>> drivers/clk/clk.c | 15 +++------------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> index 2cf2ea6b77a1..26825db03e64 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> @@ -1983,20 +1983,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_clk_unregister);
>> * re-enter into the clk framework by calling any top-level clk APIs;
>> * this will cause a nested prepare_lock mutex.
>> *
>> - * Pre-change notifier callbacks will be passed the current, pre-change
>> - * rate of the clk via struct clk_notifier_data.old_rate. The new,
>> - * post-change rate of the clk is passed via struct
>> + * In all notification cases cases (pre, post and abort rate change) the
>> + * original clock rate is passed to the callback via struct
>> + * clk_notifier_data.old_rate and the new frequency is passed via struct
>> * clk_notifier_data.new_rate.
>> *
>> - * Post-change notifiers will pass the now-current, post-change rate of
>> - * the clk in both struct clk_notifier_data.old_rate and struct
>> - * clk_notifier_data.new_rate.
>> - *
>> - * Abort-change notifiers are effectively the opposite of pre-change
>> - * notifiers: the original pre-change clk rate is passed in via struct
>> - * clk_notifier_data.new_rate and the failed post-change rate is passed
>> - * in via struct clk_notifier_data.old_rate.
>> - *
>> * clk_notifier_register() must be called from non-atomic context.
>> * Returns -EINVAL if called with null arguments, -ENOMEM upon
>> * allocation failure; otherwise, passes along the return value of
>> --
>> 1.8.5.3
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-01 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-22 19:48 [PATCH] clk: Fix notifier documentation Soren Brinkmann
2014-02-01 1:49 ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-02-01 6:01 ` Mike Turquette [this message]
2014-02-03 16:36 ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-02-05 14:49 ` Mike Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPtuhTj7QmB-xFU40x_MCvbvo07M2_2sDfiOQNkf4oEGFPKiOg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).