From: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
To: "Chenyuan Yang" <chenyuan0y@gmail.com>,
<linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: nomadik: Add check for clk_enable()
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 11:24:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D9694O0MKV31.3SY6ZCTSKXWI9@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250412193153.49138-1-chenyuan0y@gmail.com>
Hello Chenyuan, Linus, Bartosz,
On Sat Apr 12, 2025 at 9:31 PM CEST, Chenyuan Yang wrote:
> Add check for the return value of clk_enable() to catch
> the potential error.
>
> This is similar to the commit 8332e6670997
> ("spi: zynq-qspi: Add check for clk_enable()").
>
> Signed-off-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 966942ae4936 ("gpio: nomadik: extract GPIO platform driver from drivers/pinctrl/nomadik/")
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-nomadik.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-nomadik.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-nomadik.c
> index fa19a44943fd..dbc4cdddf4df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-nomadik.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-nomadik.c
> @@ -262,8 +262,11 @@ static unsigned int nmk_gpio_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> struct nmk_gpio_chip *nmk_chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + int ret;
>
> - clk_enable(nmk_chip->clk);
> + ret = clk_enable(nmk_chip->clk);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> nmk_gpio_irq_unmask(d);
> return 0;
> }
Returning a negative value whereas the ->irq_startup() [0] return value
is an unsigned int? From some quick godbolt testing and briefly reading
the spec it looks safe to do a round trip (signed->unsigned->signed),
though not ideal to my eyes.
The caller is __irq_startup() [1].
As for why irq_startup returns an unsigned int, I am unsure. The kernel
Git history isn't enough to know more. The startup field in struct
hw_interrupt_type appeared on v2.3.14 [2], so no commit message to
explain decisions.
Seeing the __irq_startup() code, my proposal would be to turn the return
value to a signed int, but I haven't exhaustively checked codepaths.
Thanks,
[0]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.13.7/source/include/linux/irq.h#L503
[1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.13.7/source/kernel/irq/chip.c#L244
[2]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/2.3.14/source/include/linux/irq.h#L21
--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-14 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-12 19:31 [PATCH] gpio: nomadik: Add check for clk_enable() Chenyuan Yang
2025-04-13 7:44 ` Linus Walleij
2025-04-13 20:00 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-04-14 9:24 ` Théo Lebrun [this message]
2025-04-14 12:11 ` Chenyuan Yang
2025-04-14 18:30 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-04-16 8:35 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D9694O0MKV31.3SY6ZCTSKXWI9@bootlin.com \
--to=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=chenyuan0y@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).