linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Diederik de Haas" <didi.debian@cknow.org>
To: "Yao Zi" <ziyao@disroot.org>, "Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Frank Wang" <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>,
	"Andy Yan" <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	"Cristian Ciocaltea" <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>,
	"Detlev Casanova" <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>,
	"Shresth Prasad" <shresthprasad7@gmail.com>,
	"Chukun Pan" <amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>,
	"Jonas Karlman" <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Cc: <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add SoC prefix to register definitions
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 13:39:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DA0YJ89890ND.3NKPS3RWC012P@cknow.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCxjqDr3VivDCrBx@pie.lan>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 414 bytes --]

On Tue May 20, 2025 at 1:12 PM CEST, Yao Zi wrote:
> If putting RK3528 at first really confuses you, I'd like to add some
> extra comments to explicitly split these two kinds of register layouts
> apart and claim they aren't compatible. Although to me it's somehow
> obvious, as most definitions are prefixed with either RK3528 or RK3568.

No need. This is just another PEBKAC issue.

Cheers,
  Diederik

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-20 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-19 16:16 [PATCH v3 0/5] Support RK3528 variant of Rockchip naneng-combphy Yao Zi
2025-05-19 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: Add RK3528 pipe-phy GRF syscon Yao Zi
2025-05-19 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add RK3528 variant Yao Zi
2025-05-19 16:39   ` Conor Dooley
2025-05-19 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add SoC prefix to register definitions Yao Zi
2025-05-19 19:26   ` Diederik de Haas
2025-05-20  3:53     ` Yao Zi
2025-05-20  7:24       ` neil.armstrong
2025-05-20  8:37       ` Diederik de Haas
2025-05-20 11:12         ` Yao Zi
2025-05-20 11:39           ` Diederik de Haas [this message]
2025-05-19 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add RK3528 support Yao Zi
2025-05-20  7:22   ` neil.armstrong
2025-05-19 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add naneng-combphy for RK3528 Yao Zi
2025-05-20 17:51   ` Jonas Karlman
2025-05-21  2:27     ` Yao Zi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DA0YJ89890ND.3NKPS3RWC012P@cknow.org \
    --to=didi.debian@cknow.org \
    --cc=amadeus@jmu.edu.cn \
    --cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com \
    --cc=detlev.casanova@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frank.wang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shresthprasad7@gmail.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziyao@disroot.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).