From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: "Xu Kuohai" <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Mykola Lysenko" <mykolal@fb.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Florent Revest" <revest@chromium.org>
Cc: "Bastien Curutchet" <bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com>,
<ebpf@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"Xu Kuohai" <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf, arm64: Support up to 12 function arguments
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 10:45:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DA6T7OEF94IG.2BH2PWTCVEOTA@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d184497-fecf-497f-8b4c-bcd4b0a697ce@huaweicloud.com>
Hi Xu, thanks for the review
On Tue May 27, 2025 at 10:11 AM CEST, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> On 5/22/2025 6:14 PM, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> -static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int args_off, int nregs)
>> +struct arg_aux {
>> + /* how many args are passed through registers, the rest of the args are
>> + * passed through stack
>> + */
>> + int args_in_regs;
>> + /* how many registers are used to pass arguments */
>> + int regs_for_args;
>> + /* how much stack is used for additional args passed to bpf program
>> + * that did not fit in original function registers
>> + **/
>
> nit: "**/" should be "*/"
ACK
[...]
>> + a->ostack_for_args = 0;
>> +
>> + /* the rest arguments are passed through stack */
>> + for (a->ostack_for_args = 0, a->bstack_for_args = 0;
>> + i < m->nr_args; i++) {
>
> a->ostack_for_args is initialized twice.
>
> move all initializations before the loop?
ACK
>> + /* We can not know for sure about exact alignment needs for
>> + * struct passed on stack, so deny those
>> + */
>> + if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> leave the error code as is, namely, return -ENOTSUPP?
Actually this change follows a complaint from checkpatch:
"WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP"
>> + stack_slots = (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8;
>> + /* AAPCS 64 C.14: arguments passed on stack must be aligned to
>> + * max(8, arg_natural_alignment)
>> + */
>> + a->bstack_for_args += stack_slots * 8;
>> + a->ostack_for_args = round_up(a->ostack_for_args + stack_slots * 8, 8);
>
> since a->ostack_for_args starts from 0 and is always incremented
> by multiples of 8, round_up() to 8 is not needed.
True. This is a (partial) remnant from the first attempt to handle more
exotic alignments like large structs or __int128, but that's indeed not
needed for this current version. I'll clean it up.
[...]
>> + for (i = a->args_in_regs; i < m->nr_args; i++) {
>> + slots = (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8;
>> + /* AAPCS C.14: additional arguments on stack must be
>> + * aligned on max(8, arg_natural_alignment)
>> + */
>> + soff = round_up(soff, 8);
>> + if (for_call_origin)
>> + doff = round_up(doff, 8);
>
> since both soff and doff start from multiples of 8 and are
> incremented by 8 each time, the two round_up()s are also
> not needed.
ACK. I guess the small AAPCS mention can go too then.
>
>> + /* verifier ensures arg_size <= 16, so slots equals 1 or 2 */
>> + while (slots-- > 0) {
>> + emit(A64_LDR64I(tmp, A64_FP, soff), ctx);
>> + /* if there is unused space in the last slot, clear
>> + * the garbage contained in the space.
>> + */
>> + if (slots == 0 && !for_call_origin)
>> + clear_garbage(ctx, tmp, m->arg_size[i] % 8);
>> + emit(A64_STR64I(tmp, A64_SP, doff), ctx);
>> + soff += 8;
>> + doff += 8;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>
> [...]
--
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-27 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-22 10:14 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf, arm64: support up to 12 arguments Alexis Lothoré
2025-05-22 10:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf, arm64: Support up to 12 function arguments Alexis Lothoré
2025-05-27 8:11 ` Xu Kuohai
2025-05-27 8:45 ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]
2025-05-27 9:09 ` Xu Kuohai
2025-05-27 9:13 ` Alexis Lothoré
2025-05-22 10:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: enable many-args tests for arm64 Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DA6T7OEF94IG.2BH2PWTCVEOTA@bootlin.com \
--to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ebpf@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huawei.com \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).