From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93066CA0EC4 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:36:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To :From:Subject:Message-Id:Date:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=HT2hqwAZZG0UAbHiYEwWNljrR3mJBNDjqO64v62M4Fo=; b=x/NjWAFU8JpvNh8iR/PPOw7AHK 0zWWNKQyvc76kIuuH9T9XNa/A2rS0M50e7Mz/iu6QVRJfxEuolKd20w90HKfkbhklGwKWpPLeHZ5m /eOGD/DabUDIQGqusYFDWCAngsOBgeDrvuNDE7z1lu4OH0zwxcs4eYshxYyQU6JL2PaH9cBEbd5kR pQsMy3/UTvicxqBdN/TMyV2YnKb1mUlH7EI9oiXk6Ak+kRLzxkWfkjHsyJoVCF0cCG3tnez4K+jom DE9m7k0e5e/ZfBJ2WOrznSrgS7l/2SIo6gdArIjPH/aXLHGap5geziU3Hm9cwGYBCyfqqinEIBn/6 66UKTc7A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ulryg-0000000BR8K-2ufR; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:35:58 +0000 Received: from out-178.mta1.migadu.com ([95.215.58.178]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ulozW-0000000AuUl-1ohX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 13:24:39 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow.org; s=key1; t=1755005066; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HT2hqwAZZG0UAbHiYEwWNljrR3mJBNDjqO64v62M4Fo=; b=fO1COuL7ORNxs3B9H3eGGgHU9jirAwVsKZdXfDYQgh+bWhrPOwnFtvbFpwFtmMrK8h7QSx G1R1zOR/S018416supYWIA/skr45GD15EDyxzwf5e02YMHZ3gWFQuWrV2108YVFoKmMHyc hbuoLiHAtfyt6ZgiYCo20JrHBiT6byXF+QYtTvctbCorhcpSW/GeEyUGP3zR/E0lWMdhHe BjWQezA7xH3eHnGuTxNraXzhvJ0fQLGcXrAI64bheWpRKS/FiWloe/KEsydGnJK9vU4bHC SXnUYbPFfsivpYnu++s2au44lOTAWHdj3xDLn+7hr1tUQUVkX9R1EGDKhsOHuw== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=72ec2ff28c27c182335a5ca95df6427b9de7efab639d68f403e5354ccd1f; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:23:55 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rockchip/drm: vop2: make vp registers nonvolatile X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Diederik de Haas" To: =?utf-8?q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= , "Piotr Zalewski" Cc: , , , , , , , , , , References: <20250706083629.140332-2-pZ010001011111@proton.me> <4207630.fIoEIV5pvu@diego> In-Reply-To: <4207630.fIoEIV5pvu@diego> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250812_062438_612642_91178453 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --72ec2ff28c27c182335a5ca95df6427b9de7efab639d68f403e5354ccd1f Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Heiko, On Sun Jul 6, 2025 at 12:46 PM CEST, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote: > Am Sonntag, 6. Juli 2025, 12:37:40 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit schr= ieb Diederik de Haas: >> On Sun Jul 6, 2025 at 12:20 PM CEST, Piotr Zalewski wrote: >> >> With a new version of a patch, you're supposed to add the tags you >> >> received for previous versions, like my Tested-by tag [1]. >> >>=20 >> >> (unless the new version has changed so much you feel they should not = be >> >> carried over; you then need to explicitly describe that and why you >> >> dropped them) >> > =20 >> > Forgot... Should i send it as PATCH v2 RESEND? >>=20 >> I don't think that's needed; the maintainer will let you know if that's >> desirable or that they will add it (back) when committing. > > The problem is then remembering to manually collect the tags from a > previous series. > > For my reference, it was > Tested-by: Diederik de Haas > > So hopefully I'll remember now :-) and there is no need for a resend > at this time. Is more needed to get this patch accepted? If so, can I help with that? Cheers, Diederik --72ec2ff28c27c182335a5ca95df6427b9de7efab639d68f403e5354ccd1f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCaJtAgAAKCRDXblvOeH7b blk/AP9qVD2EKzBtPo/59n2gdL4G9t/u9M80pLQJzj/tM0PwowEA/d9FYzxx/rFZ lfZGkb8gpfOqw60ZYCxDwIfQQoqU7wQ= =3G71 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --72ec2ff28c27c182335a5ca95df6427b9de7efab639d68f403e5354ccd1f--