From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@kernel.org>,
"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
"Samuel Holland" <samuel@sholland.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] base: soc: export soc_device_get_machine()
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 12:36:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DFSJ9QN6U81W.19R0VFKTEFZKR@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119-soc-of-root-v1-3-32a0fa9a78b4@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Mon Jan 19, 2026 at 11:40 AM CET, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> -static void soc_device_get_machine(struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr)
> +int soc_device_get_machine(struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr)
> {
> - struct device_node *np;
> -
> if (soc_dev_attr->machine)
> - return;
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENOENT;
This should never fail at this point, no? Also, can't we just use of_root?
>
> - np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> - of_property_read_string(np, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine);
> - of_node_put(np);
> + return of_property_read_string(np, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(soc_device_get_machine);
If we want to export this, we shouldn't reuse the existing name, which is
misleading.
soc_device_get_machine() reads as if we return a reference count of something.
Additionally, it operates on struct soc_device_attribute instead of struct
soc_device, where the name suggests the latter.
Instead this should be soc_device_attribute_read_machine() or if we want a
shorter name, just soc_attr_read_machine().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-19 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 10:40 [PATCH 0/8] soc: remove direct accesses to of_root from drivers/soc/ Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 10:40 ` [PATCH 1/8] of: provide of_machine_get_compatible() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 11:06 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-01-19 11:26 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-19 13:00 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 13:20 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-19 19:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-01-19 10:40 ` [PATCH 2/8] base: soc: order includes alphabetically Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 11:07 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-01-19 10:40 ` [PATCH 3/8] base: soc: export soc_device_get_machine() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 11:08 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-01-19 11:36 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-01-19 18:41 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-19 19:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-01-19 10:40 ` [PATCH 4/8] soc: fsl: guts: don't access of_root directly Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 11:05 ` LEROY Christophe
2026-01-19 11:06 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-01-19 10:40 ` [PATCH 5/8] soc: imx8m: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 10:40 ` [PATCH 6/8] soc: imx9: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-27 2:39 ` Peng Fan
2026-01-19 10:40 ` [PATCH 7/8] soc: renesas: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 19:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-23 13:45 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 10:40 ` [PATCH 8/8] soc: sunxi: mbus: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-01-19 15:36 ` Jernej Škrabec
2026-01-20 7:55 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-01-20 8:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DFSJ9QN6U81W.19R0VFKTEFZKR@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox