Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Cc: <ebpf@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Bastien Curutchet" <bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com>,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] bpf, x86: refactor BPF_ST management in do_jit
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 16:22:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJ1I3B2TSXSL.AV4PS9YH714@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604-kasan-v2-4-c066e627fda8@bootlin.com>

On Thu Jun 4, 2026 at 1:22 PM PDT, Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
> In order to prepare for KASAN checks insertion before every
> memory-related load or store, group all BPF_ST instructions that indeed
> access memory in a single block of fall-through cases to allow
> instrumenting those in one call, rather than having to instrument all
> cases individually.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 0981791014eb..943a0f315cf2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -2300,41 +2300,50 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *
>  			EMIT_LFENCE();
>  			break;
>  
> -			/* ST: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = imm */
>  		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
> -			if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
> -				EMIT2(0x41, 0xC6);
> -			else
> -				EMIT1(0xC6);
> -			goto st;
>  		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
> -			if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
> -				EMIT3(0x66, 0x41, 0xC7);
> -			else
> -				EMIT2(0x66, 0xC7);
> -			goto st;
>  		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
> -			if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
> -				EMIT2(0x41, 0xC7);
> -			else
> -				EMIT1(0xC7);
> -			goto st;
>  		case BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
> -			if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_PARAMS && insn->off == -8) {
> -				/* Arg 6: store immediate in r9 register */
> -				emit_mov_imm64(&prog, X86_REG_R9, imm32 >> 31, (u32)imm32);
> +			switch (BPF_SIZE(insn->code)) {
> +			case BPF_B:
> +				if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
> +					EMIT2(0x41, 0xC6);
> +				else
> +					EMIT1(0xC6);
> +				break;
> +			case BPF_H:
> +				if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
> +					EMIT3(0x66, 0x41, 0xC7);
> +				else
> +					EMIT2(0x66, 0xC7);
> +				break;
> +			case BPF_W:
> +				if (is_ereg(dst_reg))
> +					EMIT2(0x41, 0xC7);
> +				else
> +					EMIT1(0xC7);
> +				break;
> +			case BPF_DW:
> +				if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_PARAMS &&
> +				    insn->off == -8) {
> +					/* Arg 6: store immediate in r9 register */
> +					emit_mov_imm64(&prog, X86_REG_R9,
> +						       imm32 >> 31, (u32)imm32);
> +					break;
> +				}
> +				EMIT2(add_1mod(0x48, dst_reg), 0xC7);

maybe it's an opportunity to cover this into separate helper function?
When indent reaches 4 tabs it's about time.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-05 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-04 20:21 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] bpf: add support for KASAN checks in JITed programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 20:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/8] bpf: mark instructions accessing program stack Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 21:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 23:20   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] bpf: add BPF_JIT_KASAN for KASAN instrumentation of JITed programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 21:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] bpf, x86: add helper to emit kasan checks in x86 " Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] bpf, x86: refactor BPF_ST management in do_jit Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 21:13   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 23:22   ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] bpf, x86: emit KASAN checks into x86 JITed programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-05 14:54   ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-05 15:50     ` Alexis Lothoré
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/8] bpf, x86: enable KASAN for JITed programs on x86 Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/8] selftests/bpf: add helper to check whether eBPF KASAN is active Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 20:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] selftests/bpf: add tests to validate KASAN on JIT programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-06-04 21:45   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-05 15:47   ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-05 16:01     ` Alexis Lothoré
     [not found]       ` <f73d0971-0544-4a92-bde7-b2fbfcdaf28b@linux.dev>
2026-06-05 20:55         ` Alexis Lothoré
2026-06-06  4:09           ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-06  8:51             ` Alexis Lothoré

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DJ1I3B2TSXSL.AV4PS9YH714@gmail.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebpf@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox