From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AAE9CD98F2 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:08:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:References:To: From:Subject:Cc:Message-Id:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Mime-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=bm87lO1WY51W1JQZ6AFcWt4PscTutQWjvvP0wDQnS1Q=; b=ehRFK7gnDLcJ0c0M9lJFJ8i2cO DUTIdvGuJHK0/Nwzy78BJtG7/TeCZMbdbZHYzYVvfZYt9qzcjMDmTI+s7hi3wDQ+Di15mvgTydvdj Ncy45ZmHDYOVWyZpZjyhlF3v70K162uxmVmXoL6f9C5+3gQaVyNlB9989ZNPFnFiPSqkimHt7PuGB 0eRrF0WPxTBidi+4Jli3rBhzMcn+RUR1CgseAI6kMNVfyGucEKMaMFOge2qrzUjBCLhPcHj4kCp0f ATKInkoFuvdv8Zo0gRwFMHjtdh/SqeUFKwzTu2I+NENwIaQtkafrg3bqcHzE7dDEGPTvbZOPKVPFM 0y2dbJpA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wc0rz-00000006Jwo-0Nzo; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:08:51 +0000 Received: from out-183.mta1.migadu.com ([95.215.58.183]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wc0rw-00000006Jw1-49VR for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:08:50 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow-tech.com; s=key1; t=1782220126; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bm87lO1WY51W1JQZ6AFcWt4PscTutQWjvvP0wDQnS1Q=; b=Jfhz3xEZlv0Q/ZeopIdCK4IgxmFSrBVcWyz29qGDLMc8XkPXOHioHSga9BlFaVxY9HuI9a aqAMSygPKToaLFrwHsPS/k7X6p7vGrWrslP4snAR90xFkskfU+g9BWurucH1/2VEyc+OkJ ZnvbLs1IDCpcOPj9pnMCkJCOEaBKhm5g9q1bXncD6Jk7aRotmJqW9+fmunVLMtr1ZnUpr3 lomYuMOsjFeeIae+QHegz/esBPyhuYs41Sfx86eHE2nimZXQ0g/LqlNhBKZ4YsM2+IkI+W +5E/KpafopJ63ZXZAdaA93513l1NksHGgrDh9kORk5tTqmrOjDJhiZz1GAFevA== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 15:08:36 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: "Nicolas Frattaroli" , , , , , , "Ricardo Pardini" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] clk: rockchip: rk3588: add GATE_GRF clocks for I2S MCLK output to IO X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Diederik de Haas" To: "Diederik de Haas" , "Daniele Briguglio" , "Heiko Stuebner" , "Michael Turquette" , "Stephen Boyd" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" References: <20260419-rk3588-mclk-gate-grf-v4-0-513a42dd1dcc@superkali.me> <20260419-rk3588-mclk-gate-grf-v4-5-513a42dd1dcc@superkali.me> <2100447.PIDvDuAF1L@diego> <20260623123316.4111002-1-hello@superkali.me> In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260623_060849_184912_D7CF6EF7 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.38 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue Jun 23, 2026 at 3:05 PM CEST, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Tue Jun 23, 2026 at 2:33 PM CEST, Daniele Briguglio wrote: >> If that turns out to be the case, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED on the gates is a >> reasonable way to stop the kernel from closing a gate the firmware alrea= dy >> left open, for boards that would rather not switch their DTS to _TO_IO. > > I'm not so sure I agree that CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED is reasonable, but I'll le= ave > judgement up to others. I'll do the test regardless, though. Ah, just learned those should be added to your patch, in which case my objection goes away.