On Thu Aug 13, 2026 at 5:19 PM CEST, Miquel Raynal wrote: > The _BUGGY suffix is not super accurate. There is a behavior that indeed > seems strange, but it is somewhat documented. The fact is, with this QER > field the status register is considered 16-bit wide and if one writes > the first 8 bits (SR1) without the next 8 bits (SR2) then the content of > SR2 will be assumed to be 0x00 and will be cleared. > > Rename it BFPT_DWORD15_QER_SR2_BIT1_NO_1B_WR to align with the other > namings (_NO_RD) and clarify the meaning of this field. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal Reviewed-by: Michael Walle