From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76F74C5CFC1 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:50:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:References:To: From:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:Date:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=H0l1bX0P5bF/3uYea5/qCNJ8xdsZ091OoFQroj+MxKg=; b=C3c+liOar+TLtKj7H1keT92sys 355Kmtfg6yWnmjMU8DLhfhV9veorNrdLUtZZ95O0mD0aJUVQv6NKz+bKD2UOd4wMQYWJhPrTDU0R0 E39HLpQWnUOyG9HsvNSr4Bd7r6mW1iou3OnORDlJBVTdUuOmtVdkAKbs7X9M/2NuXqHmUCMQCTlVQ KqysWXJ7Zps5IPk5wk5bCFK+3P3G8VtoWN0mdA2PEhbHlzg1HRfqlaip03KOpgjtes+2PIIJbiueg NwYuVWOD0mPB+o/p/ZJAByBBsyC8KWEwKrgfMXGOFM1RsfCXTHhjRUpAMVRY9qgtsLaRm2ZlO6U3q Vop8pwaQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wuoYq-00000002RxB-0Hz4; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:50:48 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wuoYp-00000002Rx2-1xFm; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:50:47 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id C67234357D; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 275B81F000E9; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:50:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786701046; bh=H0l1bX0P5bF/3uYea5/qCNJ8xdsZ091OoFQroj+MxKg=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=mD7JoOGg+bCqUwWzQx+ixQedBeOVQjanfMooqc1zfcQ6jIy8gcx7WoB/8K5rkoF2l t7UKFlHx00P899tgTWaG80iIdvkztAeeyecOtwcV4REH+kpeaMXuLJoe5zkanE1TkK k8YmAU6Zd0Qq4U8FQKbApMKxYT3f1/sgOUo9Q1h3n73ju++5go2Uo8SnAR5QxVv27G u1DGJba2odaNjCfmjGo0uQjgJGCrQcw1tm07eJIJLhcxyc5vvBd/qUB20GAj5uKrpL lZBaQzgXYTMufhVJ1HMwQeL8adKkv0zpzHHlZGecNpRF0LiqIA5yTWTQ04XDyW+m4X rgTnXICsfksxg== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=eb63d10512d69bdb04bec46da322ab820769e4ca9794a46ddfb20fe54ed9; micalg=pgp-sha384; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:50:42 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/23] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: Prepare introduction of W25QxxRV-M parts Cc: "Steam Lin" , "Hsin-Yi Wang" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , , , , From: "Michael Walle" To: "Miquel Raynal" , "Pratyush Yadav" , "Takahiro Kuwano" , "Richard Weinberger" , "Vignesh Raghavendra" , "Nicolas Ferre" , "Alexandre Belloni" , "Claudiu Beznea" , "Jonathan Corbet" , "Shuah Khan" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20260813-winbond-v7-1-spi-nor-rv-addition-v3-0-b637cf120d5c@bootlin.com> <20260813-winbond-v7-1-spi-nor-rv-addition-v3-15-b637cf120d5c@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <20260813-winbond-v7-1-spi-nor-rv-addition-v3-15-b637cf120d5c@bootlin.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --eb63d10512d69bdb04bec46da322ab820769e4ca9794a46ddfb20fe54ed9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu Aug 13, 2026 at 5:19 PM CEST, Miquel Raynal wrote: > There is an ID collision between the JV and RV families. Both chips are > very similar in practice, it is mostly a matter of electrical > differences (mostly power consumption being lower). > > As a significant difference, RV chips identify themselves as supporting > The new SFDP (rev F) field which forces an alternate write SR2 opcode > (0x31). > > Since they share the IDs but not the names, we must hide the names using > a fixup. > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal Reviewed-by: Michael Walle --eb63d10512d69bdb04bec46da322ab820769e4ca9794a46ddfb20fe54ed9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iKgEABMJADAWIQTIVZIcOo5wfU/AngkSJzzuPgIf+AUCan7k8xIcbXdhbGxlQGtl cm5lbC5vcmcACgkQEic87j4CH/hpuAF8C29KVtaU3EHuv/+cbDPwhdKI1sPD/5To uAiMO+bgZdygmwbTX2ytZg2/MQnE4jxMAYDw/epGxqDoLw1bXO660VuEMFb6kofV 67B++mdpvZubIKKYRCrJyotWvjO0+JX7DmA= =ZmIc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eb63d10512d69bdb04bec46da322ab820769e4ca9794a46ddfb20fe54ed9--