From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ARM: cache-l2x0: avoid taking spinlock for every iteration
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:40:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1NJVwt-0006uj-11@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
Taking the spinlock for every iteration is very expensive; instead,
batch iterations up into 4K blocks, releasing and reacquiring the
spinlock between each block.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
---
arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
index b480f1d..c1b7bff 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
@@ -31,14 +31,10 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(l2x0_lock);
static inline void sync_writel(unsigned long val, unsigned long reg,
unsigned long complete_mask)
{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags);
writel(val, l2x0_base + reg);
/* wait for the operation to complete */
while (readl(l2x0_base + reg) & complete_mask)
;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags);
}
static inline void cache_sync(void)
@@ -48,15 +44,20 @@ static inline void cache_sync(void)
static inline void l2x0_inv_all(void)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
/* invalidate all ways */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags);
sync_writel(0xff, L2X0_INV_WAY, 0xff);
cache_sync();
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags);
}
static void l2x0_inv_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
- unsigned long addr;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags);
if (start & (CACHE_LINE_SIZE - 1)) {
start &= ~(CACHE_LINE_SIZE - 1);
sync_writel(start, L2X0_CLEAN_INV_LINE_PA, 1);
@@ -68,29 +69,67 @@ static void l2x0_inv_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
sync_writel(end, L2X0_CLEAN_INV_LINE_PA, 1);
}
- for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += CACHE_LINE_SIZE)
- sync_writel(addr, L2X0_INV_LINE_PA, 1);
+ while (start < end) {
+ unsigned long blk_end = start + min(end - start, 4096UL);
+
+ while (start < blk_end) {
+ sync_writel(start, L2X0_INV_LINE_PA, 1);
+ start += CACHE_LINE_SIZE;
+ }
+
+ if (blk_end < end) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags);
+ }
+ }
cache_sync();
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags);
}
static void l2x0_clean_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
- unsigned long addr;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags);
start &= ~(CACHE_LINE_SIZE - 1);
- for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += CACHE_LINE_SIZE)
- sync_writel(addr, L2X0_CLEAN_LINE_PA, 1);
+ while (start < end) {
+ unsigned long blk_end = start + min(end - start, 4096UL);
+
+ while (start < blk_end) {
+ sync_writel(start, L2X0_CLEAN_LINE_PA, 1);
+ start += CACHE_LINE_SIZE;
+ }
+
+ if (blk_end < end) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags);
+ }
+ }
cache_sync();
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags);
}
static void l2x0_flush_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
- unsigned long addr;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags);
start &= ~(CACHE_LINE_SIZE - 1);
- for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += CACHE_LINE_SIZE)
- sync_writel(addr, L2X0_CLEAN_INV_LINE_PA, 1);
+ while (start < end) {
+ unsigned long blk_end = start + min(end - start, 4096UL);
+
+ while (start < blk_end) {
+ sync_writel(start, L2X0_CLEAN_INV_LINE_PA, 1);
+ start += CACHE_LINE_SIZE;
+ }
+
+ if (blk_end < end) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&l2x0_lock, flags);
+ }
+ }
cache_sync();
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l2x0_lock, flags);
}
void __init l2x0_init(void __iomem *base, __u32 aux_val, __u32 aux_mask)
--
1.6.2.5
next reply other threads:[~2009-12-12 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-12 17:40 Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2009-12-14 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] ARM: cache-l2x0: avoid taking spinlock for every iteration Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1NJVwt-0006uj-11@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).