From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: GIC: move gic_data[] initialization into gic_init()
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:35:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1PPCsB-0004xa-H0@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101205113311.GC9138@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
This avoids writing unnecessarily to gic_data[] from other CPUs,
making this a mostly read-only variable.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
---
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index c48634a..b6a1d09 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_controller_lock);
/* Address of GIC 0 CPU interface */
-void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
+void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr __read_mostly;
struct gic_chip_data {
unsigned int irq_offset;
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
#define MAX_GIC_NR 1
#endif
-static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX_GIC_NR];
+static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX_GIC_NR] __read_mostly;
static inline void __iomem *gic_dist_base(unsigned int irq)
{
@@ -210,21 +210,16 @@ void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
set_irq_chained_handler(irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq);
}
-static void __init gic_dist_init(unsigned int gic_nr, void __iomem *base,
+static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
unsigned int irq_start)
{
unsigned int max_irq, i;
+ void __iomem *base = gic->dist_base;
u32 cpumask = 1 << smp_processor_id();
- if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
- BUG();
-
cpumask |= cpumask << 8;
cpumask |= cpumask << 16;
- gic_data[gic_nr].dist_base = base;
- gic_data[gic_nr].irq_offset = (irq_start - 1) & ~31;
-
writel(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
/*
@@ -269,9 +264,9 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(unsigned int gic_nr, void __iomem *base,
/*
* Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
*/
- for (i = irq_start; i < gic_data[gic_nr].irq_offset + max_irq; i++) {
+ for (i = irq_start; i < gic->irq_offset + max_irq; i++) {
set_irq_chip(i, &gic_chip);
- set_irq_chip_data(i, &gic_data[gic_nr]);
+ set_irq_chip_data(i, gic);
set_irq_handler(i, handle_level_irq);
set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
}
@@ -279,19 +274,12 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(unsigned int gic_nr, void __iomem *base,
writel(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
}
-static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init(unsigned int gic_nr, void __iomem *base)
+static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
{
- void __iomem *dist_base;
+ void __iomem *dist_base = gic->dist_base;
+ void __iomem *base = gic->cpu_base;
int i;
- if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
- BUG();
-
- dist_base = gic_data[gic_nr].dist_base;
- BUG_ON(!dist_base);
-
- gic_data[gic_nr].cpu_base = base;
-
/*
* Deal with the banked PPI and SGI interrupts - disable all
* PPI interrupts, ensure all SGI interrupts are enabled.
@@ -312,15 +300,27 @@ static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init(unsigned int gic_nr, void __iomem *base)
void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
void __iomem *dist_base, void __iomem *cpu_base)
{
+ struct gic_chip_data *gic;
+
+ BUG_ON(gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR);
+
+ gic = &gic_data[gic_nr];
+ gic->dist_base = dist_base;
+ gic->cpu_base = cpu_base;
+ gic->irq_offset = (irq_start - 1) & ~31;
+
if (gic_nr == 0)
gic_cpu_base_addr = cpu_base;
- gic_dist_init(gic_nr, dist_base, irq_start);
- gic_cpu_init(gic_nr, cpu_base);
+
+ gic_dist_init(gic, irq_start);
+ gic_cpu_init(gic);
}
void __cpuinit gic_secondary_init(unsigned int gic_nr)
{
- gic_cpu_init(gic_nr, gic_data[gic_nr].cpu_base);
+ BUG_ON(gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR);
+
+ gic_cpu_init(&gic_data[gic_nr]);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
--
1.6.2.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-05 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-05 11:33 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: GIC: cleanup Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: GIC: provide a single initialization function for boot CPU Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-05 21:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-12-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: GIC: Remove MMIO address from gic_cpu_init, rename to gic_secondary_init Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-05 21:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-12-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: GIC: consolidate gic_cpu_base_addr to common GIC code Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-05 22:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-12-05 11:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-12-05 22:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: GIC: move gic_data[] initialization into gic_init() Catalin Marinas
2010-12-05 11:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: GIC: private a standard get_irqnr_preamble assembler macro Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-05 22:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-12-13 17:23 ` [PATCH 0/5] ARM: GIC: cleanup Abhijeet Dharmapurikar
2010-12-13 17:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-14 18:11 ` Abhijeet Dharmapurikar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1PPCsB-0004xa-H0@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).