linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Applied "ASoC: uniphier: remove redundant check of PLL ID" to the asoc tree
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:50:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1fWNOS-0002fp-81@debutante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180621025628.4046-1-suzuki.katsuhiro@socionext.com>

The patch

   ASoC: uniphier: remove redundant check of PLL ID

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 366f074d047b2538cc5d7e4a820bb6c117a3ccec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Katsuhiro Suzuki <suzuki.katsuhiro@socionext.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:56:28 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: uniphier: remove redundant check of PLL ID

This patch removes redudant check of PLL ID. struct uniphier_aio_pll
enable member has already been checked at is_valid_pll().

Signed-off-by: Katsuhiro Suzuki <suzuki.katsuhiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.c b/sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.c
index 2d9b7dde2ffa..ee90e6c3937c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.c
+++ b/sound/soc/uniphier/aio-cpu.c
@@ -219,15 +219,10 @@ static int uniphier_aio_set_pll(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int pll_id,
 				unsigned int freq_out)
 {
 	struct uniphier_aio *aio = uniphier_priv(dai);
-	struct device *dev = &aio->chip->pdev->dev;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!is_valid_pll(aio->chip, pll_id))
 		return -EINVAL;
-	if (!aio->chip->plls[pll_id].enable) {
-		dev_err(dev, "PLL(%d) is not implemented\n", pll_id);
-		return -ENOTSUPP;
-	}
 
 	ret = aio_chip_set_pll(aio->chip, pll_id, freq_out);
 	if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.18.0.rc2

      reply	other threads:[~2018-06-22 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21  2:56 [PATCH v2] ASoC: uniphier: remove redundant check of PLL ID Katsuhiro Suzuki
2018-06-22 14:50 ` Mark Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1fWNOS-0002fp-81@debutante \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).