From: charu@ti.com (Varadarajan, Charulatha)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 1/1] omap: Ptr "isr_reg" tracked as NULL was dereferenced
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:25:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EAF47CD23C76F840A9E7FCE10091EFAB030D099AFD@dbde02.ent.ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7bb69801f49283c3bde78aa008c15308ac8a5fbf.1286961160.git.EXT-Eugeny.Kuznetsov@nokia.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Evgeny Kuznetsov [mailto:EXT-Eugeny.Kuznetsov at nokia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 3:35 PM
> To: tony at atomide.com
> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org; Balbi, Felipe; linux at arm.linux.org.uk;
> khilman at deeprootsystems.com; akpm at linux-foundation.org; Varadarajan,
> Charulatha; tero.kristo at nokia.com; ext-eugeny.kuznetsov at nokia.com
> Subject: [PATCHv2 1/1] omap: Ptr "isr_reg" tracked as NULL was
> dereferenced
>
> From: Evgeny Kuznetsov <ext-eugeny.kuznetsov@nokia.com>
>
> Value of "isr_reg" pointer is depend on configuration and GPIO method.
> Potentially it may have NULL value and it is dereferenced later
> in code. If pointer is NULL there is some kernel issue.
Can you elaborate?
> Warning and exit from function are added in this case.
> Also compilation check is added for correct architecture
> configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgeny Kuznetsov <EXT-Eugeny.Kuznetsov@nokia.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> index c05c653..d04913c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> @@ -1318,6 +1318,23 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
> struct irq_desc *desc)
> if (bank->method == METHOD_GPIO_44XX)
> isr_reg = bank->base + OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUS0;
> #endif
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP15XX) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP850) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)
> +
> +#error "Incorrect arch configuration"
This is not required. If the architecture is not one of the above
mentioned, gpio_irq_handler() will not be used/called at all.
Also all the possible gpio methods for a given OMAP architecture are
already considered with "#ifdef"s and (bank->method) checks in
gpio_irq_handler().
> +
> +#endif
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!isr_reg))
> + goto exit;
For the above mentioned reason, this isr_reg would be non-NULL. Have
you observed this error anytime?
Also, the omap-gpio code has similar code spread all over and has to be
anyway cleaned-up. Is there any reason why gpio_irq_handler() alone is
addressed in this patch?
> +
> while(1) {
> u32 isr_saved, level_mask = 0;
> u32 enabled;
> @@ -1377,6 +1394,7 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
> struct irq_desc *desc)
> configured, we must unmask the bank interrupt only after
> handler(s) are executed in order to avoid spurious bank
> interrupt */
> +exit:
> if (!unmasked)
> desc->chip->unmask(irq);
>
> --
> 1.6.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-13 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-13 10:04 [PATCHv2 0/1] omap: Ptr "isr_reg" tracked as NULL was dereferenced Evgeny Kuznetsov
2010-10-13 10:04 ` [PATCHv2 1/1] " Evgeny Kuznetsov
2010-10-13 10:55 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha [this message]
2010-10-13 11:43 ` Evgeny Kuznetsov
2010-10-13 11:50 ` Varadarajan, Charulatha
2010-10-13 12:09 ` Evgeny Kuznetsov
2010-10-15 6:16 ` Evgeny Kuznetsov
2010-10-18 23:11 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EAF47CD23C76F840A9E7FCE10091EFAB030D099AFD@dbde02.ent.ti.com \
--to=charu@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox