From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] iommu: Let 32-bit ARM drivers opt into a DMA API default domain
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:12:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E_MBcemRRcCDkgXfDjIcWg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be6cd787-8502-4499-ad62-597c1b9b7702@arm.com>
On Tuesday, October 20, 2026 8:28 PM Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 16/10/2026 7:46 am, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> > iommu_get_default_domain_type() unconditionally forces IDENTITY on
> > 32-bit ARM as ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU installs its own UNMANAGED domain on top
> > of whatever the group already had. Now that the ARM DMA API state is an
> > ordinary domain cookie, IOMMU drivers can ask for a real
> > IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA default domain instead. Drop the override so that
> > ->def_domain_type is honoured, and let a driver-requested DMA domain
> > through the !CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA guard when ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU can back it.
> >
> > IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA stays strictly opt-in on 32-bit ARM and is never the
> > fallback to avoid unexpected changes, as drivers today return 0 from
> > ->def_domain_type while expecting the legacy behaviour.
> >
> > Behaviour is therefore unchanged for every existing 32-bit ARM IOMMU
> > driver:
> >
> > - exynos-iommu, omap-iommu, rockchip-iommu, msm_iommu, ipmmu-vmsa,
> > mtk_iommu*, sun50i-iommu and qcom_iommu have no ->def_domain_type,
> > so iommu_get_def_domain_type() returns the unchanged cur_type of 0,
> > which is forced to IDENTITY as before.
> > - arm-smmu returns IDENTITY for legacy bindings and 0 otherwise, which
> > ends up in the same place.
> > - tegra-smmu returns IDENTITY explicitly, and keeps doing so until a
> > later patch.
> >
> > Also move the static_assert on the two DMA API implementations being
> > mutually exclusive to drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.h, next to the
> > declarations that depend on it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.h | 3 +++
> > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 20 +++++---------------
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.h
> > index 71b23cb698c0..24fa4165450f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
> > * IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA default domains. Only one provider can be compiled in at a
> > * time.
> > */
> > +static_assert(!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA) &&
> > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU)));
> > +
>
> Don't the first couple of patches already make this redundant, since
> such a build would now fail anyway due to multiple definitions of
> iommu_setup_dma_ops() etc.?
That is true. I'll get rid of this.
>
> > #if defined(CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU)
> >
> > #include <asm/dma-iommu.h>
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > index 5fbb76d44a1e..0d812c4b9f08 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > @@ -1884,18 +1884,6 @@ static int iommu_get_default_domain_type(struct iommu_group *group,
> >
> > lockdep_assert_held(&group->mutex);
> >
> > - /*
> > - * ARM32 drivers supporting CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU can declare an
> > - * identity_domain and it will automatically become their default
> > - * domain. Later on ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU will install its UNMANAGED domain.
> > - * Override the selection to IDENTITY.
> > - */
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU)) {
> > - static_assert(!(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU) &&
> > - IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA)));
> > - driver_type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY;
> > - }
> > -
> > for_each_group_device(group, gdev) {
> > driver_type = iommu_get_def_domain_type(group, gdev->dev,
> > driver_type);
> > @@ -1913,11 +1901,13 @@ static int iommu_get_default_domain_type(struct iommu_group *group,
> >
> > /*
> > * If the common dma ops are not selected in kconfig then we cannot use
> > - * IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA at all. Force IDENTITY if nothing else has been
> > - * selected.
> > + * IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA at all, unless this is ARM32 and the driver asked
> > + * for it explicitly, where CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU provides the
> > + * implementation. Force IDENTITY if nothing else has been selected.
> > */
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA)) {
> > - if (WARN_ON(driver_type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA))
> > + if (WARN_ON(driver_type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA &&
> > + !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU)))
>
> This ends up looking a bit odd, and not clear that it's still more or
> less the same special-case workaround seemingly being removed in the
> hunk above.
>
> At this point I'd rather push any remaining identity special cases into
> the relevant drivers, however I'm somewhat more confident that there may
> not actually need to be any:
>
> - exynos-iommu, omap-iommu, rockchip-iommu, msm_iommu: AFAICS these all
> only ever have a single client device, so the per-group implicit domain
> should be equivalent to the per-device explicit one, so they should not
> be impacted by switching (provided the "throw away the ARM domain" idiom
> in some of their client drivers becomes non-destructive as mentioned)
>
> - mtk_iommu, sun50i-iommu, qcom_iommu, arm_smmu: While Kconfig might
> allow building them, I'm not sure we really support the first 3 on
> 32-bit at all, but again since these all have no special CONFIG_ARM
> group handling anyway then either they must work out as above or they're
> already broken, and thus at most the change might un-break them.
>
> - mtk_iommu_v1 and ipmmu-vmsa probably wouldn't care given that they end
> up attaching to their own shared domain anyway - they just can't wait to
> be able to use a proper singleton group to rip all that out :D
>
> The main reason for forcing identity was to meet the expectations of the
> existing ARM DMA ops setup, but if we're now touching the ARM code to
> properly tie that in to the IOMMU flow, then I think we can just do the
> right thing.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin.
Very well, I'll give it a shot! You're right that it /should/ work :)
Thanks
Mikko
>
> > return -1;
> > if (!driver_type)
> > driver_type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY;
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 6:46 [PATCH v2 00/11] Make the 32-bit ARM DMA API work with normal IOMMU DMA default domains (+ Tegra PoC) Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] iommu: Add iommu_teardown_dma_ops Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] iommu: Add cookie type for ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ARM: dma-mapping: Split mapping allocation from domain allocation Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] ARM: dma-mapping: Implement and expose DMA setup functions Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ARM: dma-mapping: Bypass the legacy path for core-owned DMA API domains Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-19 16:55 ` Robin Murphy
2026-10-20 4:01 ` Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ARM: dma-mapping: Handle foreign buffers in arm_iommu_get_sgtable Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-19 15:47 ` Robin Murphy
2026-10-20 3:55 ` Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] iommu: Let 32-bit ARM drivers opt into a DMA API default domain Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-20 11:28 ` Robin Murphy
2026-10-21 3:12 ` Mikko Perttunen [this message]
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] iommu/tegra-smmu: Defer display client translation to driver handover Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] gpu: host1x: Drop release of legacy 32-bit ARM DMA domain Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] drm/tegra: " Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-16 6:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] iommu/tegra-smmu: Use a DMA API default domain per swgroup Mikko Perttunen
2026-10-20 15:30 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E_MBcemRRcCDkgXfDjIcWg@nvidia.com \
--to=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox