From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36A9CC433F5 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 09:25:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date: In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description :Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=8j086IChm6iTLIwE4bK7A2HLxkjN0+8ooGZOQECLSMI=; b=jq1znvy2oF8qRo OPrCQkmtW9ymr0k9OlHOZ3+6Epe1q1bOZ2k/84Wz27ktLzu4AwVFxZdM4GuBvYpCxdXriHMixFQNO LUboxzDxNgGS32PlpNaoK5Ps9jOt+R1pLnvtPM/Y/c5lBF+WOhJCqxGHIrtzhNTqIQjh21q1d9vxA kH8CnJ7WH+oF4GSH89SuKxPRpz4QZ1hv/CSaUYttpTVeIkLpykakP3fE/h8tyKo/xyV9cAVRvXynL aVv3SNh0S64pCVkCvbpcgb4kf5rGO8WXimP5R4zbr8uLEdvpiOLw7vCGc65bcgB3QTdVL6YnAdrsq AQIPzJtWAVc6Grwd9iMw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nDjx9-004OSK-Fv; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 09:23:27 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nDjx4-004ORP-UH; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 09:23:24 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id b9so16494700lfq.6; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 01:23:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KVPWNoQrOh4gwIS/NTKfwX1pCCKtfusbVveEiycdTlA=; b=DMKpx/mOMfOI21feRiUbT2oeVdaTx0RfWxyiFQ2n5jAFIdjM+oaXTaAWOTF51h8lIt EfCy8DZfnipXO8aRfg0Mp/Y/DjwkUY3kjMzpyh3LhL7emtVBR7jykxnh9KuyyXu+IVzo +Uv+hRCF2HBbvSkvq1KbPU4KnQotY2tyU8EVZdjGW4vNrC/aXsFj8v4RKWA1bAAqY7/i V2GDPndsnk0wdqVwuogA7Uf8+TfDu7G4kdc3n4ksVQStfs7elj3cdb+Af92cwJuDqUCa E67uootxFouyYc2Y3LyprLnGvamc+q6i/Jx0IbmUFkmG+vGEWG4ZJBJSGSrxIRWng7kM 0gPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KVPWNoQrOh4gwIS/NTKfwX1pCCKtfusbVveEiycdTlA=; b=0iP8mVEO28XHLTvK7sxdl4PJ0tT9NzTlsccK05ieXTCbv9HJ6oVtjqgkOaE7RTQSyf cZldSs56kyK5DlowUthdWN8pbb6OWmaCsO7s6HJMyFavF/MMeDMxJWSMeCv2m/kgmsDG vCREMbe4hHbbi9JrMImjeBv/pMYdmNPkFEl16lnHrbnzAYPZBJmMmo3nvsPjECmRFF2j 1J2rXQLuqmCSR+fsU9q4JnT5U5u2bwfkDNnjFB+dyxI+bSUUmvezLSX1R/YZK9HkcZ9S MIZNCQdlbYBQVa/LTIxhjpuvhcx3bDUn2yz/7oSF/SbWJBLPF8ymKyt12ZuidHIRAFJq agIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nbUQaPNjTSLufsA2DHexKP5muw+aX0l0Pnx7QHdoy0DLbe6WX ap5DVuo42xbREaZahSZFnxg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyaLcKoXoj1+6kWfERTDb9i4r4ZTSXhTaGOw5RGwBC3tS/TconpSBW3IKUr+gPuifjgzU+3Ow== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:33d1:: with SMTP id d17mr1232439lfg.455.1643448199773; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 01:23:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple (31-178-191-245.dynamic.chello.pl. [31.178.191.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u15sm658935lfq.107.2022.01.29.01.23.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 29 Jan 2022 01:23:19 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rename and sort the rk356x usb2 phy handles From: Piotr Oniszczuk In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 10:23:18 +0100 Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Heiko Stuebner , Nicolas Frattaroli , Liang Chen Message-Id: References: <20220127190456.2195527-1-michael.riesch@wolfvision.net> To: Peter Geis , Michael Riesch X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220129_012323_030712_C501A978 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > > Good Evening, > > While I'm not against this idea, my main concern still stands. > I spent a great deal of thought on this, and decided to go the route I > did to maintain consistency with previous generations. > As such, I see one of three paths here: > - Pull this patch only and depart rk356x from previous SoCs. > - Do the same for previous SoCs to maintain consistency. > - Drop this patch to maintain consistency with previous SoCs. > > I ask that others weigh in here, as offline discussion has produced > mixed results already. just pure user perspective (who spent last weeks considerable time to develop DT for rk3566 tvbox. 99% of my work was by reading/learning from other boards existing DT's. Any inconsistencies in DTs makes work for such ppl like me much more harder): For option 1 - i don't see value For option 2 - what is reward for extra work needs to be done on all other SoCs? so option 3 seems to be natural choice... in other words: for me: option 1 brings practically zero value + increased inconsistency. option 2: extra work - but consistency is like in option 3 (so where is value?) so option 3 offers the same consistency - but without extra work... just my 0.02$ _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel