From: g.liakhovetski@gmx.de (Guennadi Liakhovetski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] fix compilation breakage in entry-armv.S
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:03:02 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1111081258240.10851@axis700.grange> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111108114050.GC12913@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:36:36PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Compilation of Linus' tree of today without THUMB support for V7 machines
> > breaks:
> >
> > linux-2.6/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S: Assembler messages:
> > linux-2.6/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:501: Error: backward ref to unknown label "2:"
> > linux-2.6/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:502: Error: backward ref to unknown label "3:"
> > make[2]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.o] Error 1
> >
> > Fix this by adding a check for CONFIG_ARM_THUMB.
>
> This still looks wrong. The code for '2' and '3' is included when:
>
> #if CONFIG_ARM_THUMB && __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 && CONFIG_CPU_V7
>
> is true - so the condition on including it in the exception tables should
> be the same as that.
Yes, I saw those, but, aren't they superfluous? Let's see:
arch/arm/mm/Kconfig:
config CPU_V7
...
select CPU_32v7
arch/arm/Makefile:
arch-$(CONFIG_CPU_32v7) :=-D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 $(call cc-option,-march=armv7-a,-march=armv5t -Wa$(comma)-march=armv7-a)
So, looks like CPU_V7 implies __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7? Ok, I picked up the
wrong pair, so, should this be enough:
#if CONFIG_ARM_THUMB && CONFIG_CPU_V7
and the original condition, where the labels are defined, that you
quoted, can be reduced too?
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-08 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-08 11:36 [PATCH] fix compilation breakage in entry-armv.S Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-11-08 11:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-08 12:03 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski [this message]
2011-11-08 12:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-11 15:15 ` Dave Martin
2011-11-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-11-18 15:23 ` Dave Martin
2011-11-19 19:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1111081258240.10851@axis700.grange \
--to=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox