From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEB7C433E0 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 09:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E59322BEA for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 09:24:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5E59322BEA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=4XiWO5L+3Wu1lodn8PObbsO4lZdS4IdcZV6n7d/Wxyw=; b=ZEdLoinuiozzpT4aIqS825OZm 9iP2sRATNEaD1uojGv5ZIopdsW0Vatm1rvgASU3HD3Uz/nX8hNZ1mQ73ozZW2k+Vk2SNrSp0GcgNW Thuy8I2udUWpQ2FjAtLYuZCvbR+R39ZzBtPTXsmqdRsojS6ZLl5/mhYUqwod7pk/elnqEMWknklZK MzAKtxFzAiUyg/p0q0C9mSufmozCECCUCp8hmpwKjqGTRo829oXhSGoDlTz3SfX785j3mnv5/KnIS vXr/LbZiN9pWjrXlVrfwr9dQHosRBsP4t0tea1d8RlwRZT/ie20Vjf2VdqF8HxzLxT0VOt9MeymL5 REZkGkSew==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kxny4-00025X-5r; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 09:22:00 +0000 Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kxny1-00024h-ES; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 09:21:57 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653B33003D8; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:21:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 308832B877B8A; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:21:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:21:54 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: Aarch64 EXT4FS inode checksum failures - seems to be weak memory ordering issues Message-ID: References: <20210105154726.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210106115359.GB26994@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> <20210106135253.GJ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210106172033.GA2165@willie-the-truck> <20210106223223.GM1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210107111841.GN1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210107124506.GO1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210107133747.GP1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Theodore Ts'o , Linus Torvalds , Russell King - ARM Linux admin , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andreas Dilger , linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org, Ext4 Developers List , Will Deacon , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:20:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:37 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin > > So, do we raise the minimum gcc version for the kernel as a whole to 5.1 > > or just for aarch64? > > I'd personally love to see gcc-5 as the global minimum version, as that > would let us finally use --std=gnu11 features instead of gnu89. [There are > a couple of useful features that are incompatible with gnu89, and > gnu99/gnu11 support in gcc didn't like the kernel sources] +1 for raising the tree-wide minimum (again!). We actually have a bunch of work-arounds for 4.9 bugs we can get rid of as well. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel