From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kaslr: don't pretend KASLR is enabled if offset < MIN_KIMG_ALIGN
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:01:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/3fJIROD69FBhAJ@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230223204101.1500373-1-ardb@kernel.org>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 09:41:01PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Our virtual KASLR displacement is a randomly chosen multiple of
> 2 MiB plus an offset that is equal to the physical placement modulo 2
> MiB. This arrangement ensures that we can always use 2 MiB block
> mappings (or contiguous PTE mappings for 16k or 64k pages) to map the
> kernel.
>
> This means that a KASLR offset of less than 2 MiB is simply the product
> of this physical displacement, and no randomization has actually taken
> place. Currently, we use 'kaslr_offset() > 0' to decide whether or not
> randomization has occurred, and so we misidentify this case.
> Fix this, by correctly identifying the case where the virtual
> displacement is a result of the physical displacement only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> ---
> I have sent out the same patch with a much shorter commit log as part of
> my LPA2 series before, but I only realized today that this is likely to
> fix most occurrences of the issue where a single 10g vmalloc() call
> break subsequent module loading, so I am reposting it in isolation.
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index 9dd08cd339c3f028..78e5163836a0ab95 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <linux/mmdebug.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <asm/boot.h>
> #include <asm/bug.h>
>
> #if VA_BITS > 48
> @@ -203,6 +204,16 @@ static inline unsigned long kaslr_offset(void)
> return kimage_vaddr - KIMAGE_VADDR;
> }
>
> +static inline bool kaslr_enabled(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The KASLR offset modulo MIN_KIMG_ALIGN is taken from the physical
> + * placement of the image rather than from the seed, so a displacement
> + * of less than MIN_KIMG_ALIGN means that no seed was provided.
> + */
> + return kaslr_offset() >= MIN_KIMG_ALIGN;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Allow all memory at the discovery stage. We will clip it later.
> */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 45a42cf2191c36c3..5643a9ca502af207 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -1633,7 +1633,7 @@ bool kaslr_requires_kpti(void)
> return false;
> }
>
> - return kaslr_offset() > 0;
> + return kaslr_enabled();
> }
>
> static bool __meltdown_safe = true;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c
> index 325455d16dbcb31a..e7477f21a4c9d062 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static int __init kaslr_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (!kaslr_offset()) {
> + if (!kaslr_enabled()) {
> pr_warn("KASLR disabled due to lack of seed\n");
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.39.1
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-28 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-23 20:41 [PATCH] arm64: kaslr: don't pretend KASLR is enabled if offset < MIN_KIMG_ALIGN Ard Biesheuvel
2023-02-24 13:06 ` Mark Brown
2023-02-28 11:01 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2023-02-28 13:54 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/3fJIROD69FBhAJ@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox