From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB678C05027 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 13:24:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=SNMf2NKuo6gEPtpEE5ShaDfdZ0eU2cvCmWvwo72FF8E=; b=KRftzmoICXbldd 2yTQwrX9rItPCa44jdOiOvEKz97BzEhFkwUmBNXTP/SBuy/9xeM/h4iQOdnWnMCdqRmLsiXRzgv14 7VS1a19AfLmLs22Rhf4FuNulvpweXRgHHAokyUGS5kx6IXkqHdrEQSzMkSxCOCb4+9x0vptgz3ScX mLelwqQ6w0nCJGMq/XCfi5IjtHrEtS+nGrkty8VLvQ+Il2YTughp6lOFT2jRZipMhlLIgTs1CEHWS tzCt6AEzdRApZiIDdnPwv/4aa4fLu1dJqewk3F63nCPOky+yFXx0bPPgn7ChxVrgVxyjCg1/j/1ss ZJYKBwBRviPTx1kcO0vQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pP1Si-008cJf-IB; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:23:12 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pP1Sg-008cJ6-2v for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:23:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0E360DB6; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 13:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B02D0C433EF; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 13:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 13:23:03 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Herbert Xu Cc: "kernelci.org bot" , will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, kernelci-results@groups.io, Yuan Kang Subject: Re: arm64/for-kernelci build: 2 builds: 1 failed, 1 passed, 1 error, 1 warning (v6.2-rc6-115-gca72d58361ee) Message-ID: References: <63dae0c5.170a0220.d70b2.34f8@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230206_052310_203284_1FF1B6C1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.58 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 05:57:50PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:40:30PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Actually, we can conclude that gcc-10 is not smart enough and ignore > > this report. The call gen_split_key() has len == 0: > > Yes. In any case, this should already be fixed in linux-next with > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f3e9add2210a46af99cf0fc79121c7db@AcuMS.aculab.com/T/ > > Please let me know if the problem persists with this patch. Thanks, good to know it's in -next. The patch above should clear the error, I did something similar locally just to check. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel