From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92181C636CC for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:51:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=r4eQpIKZCOUZM5E0hHSpSvkpYvqajT5mPArtQ+QlIM4=; b=0IsOkqCj9U2jIM pxGKSLs80Wmee9jDHYqkGEyAqi9Kb097DX6kzz6P/3g1NNcvPARS/qH3OE+w/y3jCAF/vmNWYZdZF QEj3FRbMzY4fd5+7s44TyYmVzSw76q5pd9w9lsta/E2llQvJaXMPPvjXXmwdz8nS5UgpEbuqtAND3 QyHWGwGw/DCMEJeQyjl2V/9HgsM5mJp3S38sBqDCHppVVUXDaBK5VtJ2zvQd1bAp2zxEaahsjOT01 etO+ETYhG8e7DfXdQMwwNdbkQHpHpj6iuxC9477Nvg5AMdOHVpW8+R906xxcKMKR2UPX2D235PnAo fsgaB4eyqgWqHcfTYaNA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pSGIw-005eud-Ov; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:50:30 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pSGIs-005etq-N1 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:50:28 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id dr8so47452719ejc.12 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:50:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DXWh76ZOzYFRd6esdMOAt4hkIxVnYRNCOqay+82OtGw=; b=s7pvKPiJ4H4PPAguWRsmZjQkfPHRQ3eLTZeRvxNYtDlCl5ES3D8PQgaf2FZfn1GQrS b4QkC22CxQ2BnAtP0J6oaVpwF/npj++eIcZm6EW6yci+BqTALtaQfo1cP+spK6+7WWvz bxVpnJ9NJaFjm4D5UMgWDAsbnlf/e8WEDZMDVzaFxFFW7p+VFzo9U6v6/6Umn57Oqnc/ 3HdpRE5BADlGI1rema0ZD7LyfIz3fk6tVqL4JV20oSDxfhEYC3OEiEI4o9H03B/KucZV T2/YC1TZHlAJN7Six6FO6ybcK3DIlBrHDdqg7OTcR6eckNlPErf0J0VjnM82vLsmtrOb 7GCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=DXWh76ZOzYFRd6esdMOAt4hkIxVnYRNCOqay+82OtGw=; b=ouzi9EhBbGp8Xr2bnVvhjodIwGknt59OH0QNJ+5o/kg0iGXLONqWtZLPxiSn4eNUh0 WP78mXiMVjYddjmMjtirkNI1JZJU4oHKH06hKfl/VMsv2DiwrAgyKG8+FlpJOZhal9pg 6++UFecd79vkDFpEop8kQwcr3XCamLzGFY89BCqpYzMsXY1rLg869n7sn8IgAu5hNbiB 03Oj0qytTc0ECa+pLqewqlJa1wmjJELZIveg58m3QF/0+tBATdoY7j2M4KukszuhXboh xzcmTgTWBa7PCQp9zZ2O41H4tki8OEuJ8fxqQSBhgqgVT5lzkq//dRUlSIRaSpx+ZhEn Qenw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWEVLj8ojGSZxvD95kFwXOP1dY/x8yzfvpz5vbUjR9DA5bOj3pc P6Ok53obMOtOo5yaxLztrMC8EQhmQkYEASTIdCs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/IEI3xhUy1WY7RE1y5OAc+SoB5NiR1zTKweaU7e8AyRcPAqWfqHmXp4wcGscO11DtLloFdHA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3bca:b0:8af:4dab:cf6c with SMTP id v10-20020a1709063bca00b008af4dabcf6cmr1743779ejf.23.1676461824304; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:50:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from jade (h-46-59-78-111.A175.priv.bahnhof.se. [46.59.78.111]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b5-20020a170906d10500b008784bc1dd05sm9514877ejz.76.2023.02.15.03.50.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 03:50:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:50:22 +0100 From: Jens Wiklander To: Etienne Carriere Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sumit Garg , op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, Cristian Marussi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tee: system invocation Message-ID: References: <20230214152047.1143106-1-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230214152047.1143106-1-etienne.carriere@linaro.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230215_035026_857718_21DB5EB8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 41.58 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 04:20:46PM +0100, Etienne Carriere wrote: > Adds TEE system invocation context provisioning for a Linux driver > to provision execution contexts for invocation of system service > hosted in TEE. OP-TEE SMC ABI implements such invocation context > provisioning. > > This feature is needed when a TEE invocation cannot afford to wait for > a free TEE thread when all TEE threads context are used and suspended > as these may be suspended waiting for a system service, as an SCMI clock > or voltage regulator, to be enabled. An example is when OP-TEE invokes > a Linux OS remote service (RPC) to access an eMMC RPMB partition and > the eMMC device is supplied by an OP-TEE SCMI regulator. > > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere > --- > Change since v1 > - Addressed comment on Linux client to claim reservation on TEE context. > This brings 2 new operations from client to TEE to request and release > system thread contexts: 2 new tee_drv.h API functions, 2 new ops > functions in struct tee_driver_ops. The OP-TEE implement shall implement > 2 new fastcall SMC funcIDs. > - Fixed typos in commit message. > --- > drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/tee_drv.h | 21 ++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h > index 73b5e7760d10..75b19e1bd185 100644 > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h > @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ struct optee_smc_call_get_os_revision_result { > * Call with struct optee_msg_arg as argument > * > * When called with OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG or > - * OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG in a0 there is one RPC struct optee_msg_arg > + * OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG or OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_SYSTEM_WITH_REGD_ARG > + * in a0 there is one RPC struct optee_msg_arg > * following after the first struct optee_msg_arg. The RPC struct > * optee_msg_arg has reserved space for the number of RPC parameters as > * returned by OPTEE_SMC_EXCHANGE_CAPABILITIES. > @@ -130,8 +131,8 @@ struct optee_smc_call_get_os_revision_result { > * a4-6 Not used > * a7 Hypervisor Client ID register > * > - * Call register usage, OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG: > - * a0 SMC Function ID, OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG > + * Call register usage, OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG and OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_SYSTEM_WITH_REGD_ARG: > + * a0 SMC Function ID, OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG or OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_SYSTEM_WITH_REGD_ARG > * a1 Upper 32 bits of a 64-bit shared memory cookie > * a2 Lower 32 bits of a 64-bit shared memory cookie > * a3 Offset of the struct optee_msg_arg in the shared memory with the > @@ -175,6 +176,8 @@ struct optee_smc_call_get_os_revision_result { > OPTEE_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG) > #define OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG \ > OPTEE_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG) > +#define OPTEE_SMC_CALL_SYSTEM_WITH_REGD_ARG \ > + OPTEE_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_SYSTEM_WITH_REGD_ARG) > > /* > * Get Shared Memory Config > @@ -254,6 +257,8 @@ struct optee_smc_get_shm_config_result { > #define OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_ASYNC_NOTIF BIT(5) > /* Secure world supports pre-allocating RPC arg struct */ > #define OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_RPC_ARG BIT(6) > +/* Secure world provisions thread for system service invocation */ > +#define OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_SYSTEM_THREAD BIT(7) > > #define OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_EXCHANGE_CAPABILITIES 9 > #define OPTEE_SMC_EXCHANGE_CAPABILITIES \ > @@ -426,6 +431,55 @@ struct optee_smc_disable_shm_cache_result { > /* See OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG above */ > #define OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG 19 > > +/* See OPTEE_SMC_CALL_SYSTEM_WITH_REGD_ARG above */ > +#define OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_SYSTEM_WITH_REGD_ARG 20 > + > +/* > + * Request reservation of a system invocation thread context in OP-TEE > + * > + * Call register usage: > + * a0 SMC Function ID: OPTEE_SMC_CALL_RESERVE_SYS_THREAD > + * a1-6 Not used > + * a7 Hypervisor Client ID register > + * > + * Normal return register usage: > + * a0 Return value, OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_* > + * a1-3 Not used > + * a4-7 Preserved > + * > + * Possible return values: > + * OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_UNKNOWN_FUNCTION Trusted OS does not recognize this > + * function. > + * OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK Call successfully completed. > + * OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_ETHREAD_LIMIT Number of Trusted OS threads exceeded > + * for the request. > + */ > +#define OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_RESERVE_SYS_THREAD 21 > +#define OPTEE_SMC_CALL_RESERVE_SYS_THREAD \ > + OPTEE_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_RESERVE_SYS_THREAD) > + > +/* > + * Unregister reservation of a system invocation thread context in OP-TEE > + * > + * Call register usage: > + * a0 SMC Function ID: OPTEE_SMC_CALL_UNRESERVE_SYS_THREAD > + * a1-6 Not used > + * a7 Hypervisor Client ID register > + * > + * Normal return register usage: > + * a0 Return value, OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_* > + * a1-3 Not used > + * a4-7 Preserved > + * > + * Possible return values: > + * OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_UNKNOWN_FUNCTION Trusted OS does not recognize this > + * function. > + * OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK Call successfully completed. > + */ > +#define OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_UNRESERVE_SYS_THREAD 22 > +#define OPTEE_SMC_CALL_UNRESERVE_SYS_THREAD \ > + OPTEE_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_UNRESERVE_SYS_THREAD) > + > /* > * Resume from RPC (for example after processing a foreign interrupt) > * > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c > index a1c1fa1a9c28..013b5ae31c0e 100644 > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c > @@ -889,7 +889,10 @@ static int optee_smc_do_call_with_arg(struct tee_context *ctx, > } > > if (rpc_arg && tee_shm_is_dynamic(shm)) { > - param.a0 = OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG; > + if (ctx->system_ctx_count) > + param.a0 = OPTEE_SMC_CALL_SYSTEM_WITH_REGD_ARG; > + else > + param.a0 = OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG; > reg_pair_from_64(¶m.a1, ¶m.a2, (u_long)shm); > param.a3 = offs; > } else { > @@ -1085,6 +1088,33 @@ static int optee_smc_open(struct tee_context *ctx) > return optee_open(ctx, sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_MEMREF_NULL); > } > > +static int optee_request_sys_ctx(struct tee_context *ctx) > +{ > + struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(ctx->teedev); > + struct arm_smccc_res res; > + > + if (!(optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_SYSTEM_THREAD)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + optee->smc.invoke_fn(OPTEE_SMC_CALL_RESERVE_SYS_THREAD, > + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res); > + > + if (res.a0 != OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void optee_release_sys_ctx(struct tee_context *ctx) > +{ > + struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(ctx->teedev); > + struct arm_smccc_res res; > + > + if (optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_SYSTEM_THREAD) > + optee->smc.invoke_fn(OPTEE_SMC_CALL_UNRESERVE_SYS_THREAD, > + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res); > +} > + > static const struct tee_driver_ops optee_clnt_ops = { > .get_version = optee_get_version, > .open = optee_smc_open, > @@ -1095,6 +1125,8 @@ static const struct tee_driver_ops optee_clnt_ops = { > .cancel_req = optee_cancel_req, > .shm_register = optee_shm_register, > .shm_unregister = optee_shm_unregister, > + .system_ctx_request = optee_request_sys_ctx, > + .system_ctx_release = optee_release_sys_ctx, > }; > > static const struct tee_desc optee_clnt_desc = { > diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c > index 98da206cd761..a7dfdea5d85b 100644 > --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c > +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__ > > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -1141,10 +1142,39 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_client_open_context); > > void tee_client_close_context(struct tee_context *ctx) > { > + while (ctx->system_ctx_count) > + tee_client_release_system_context(ctx); > + > teedev_close_context(ctx); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_client_close_context); > > +int tee_client_request_system_context(struct tee_context *ctx) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + if (!ctx->teedev->desc->ops->system_ctx_request || > + !ctx->teedev->desc->ops->system_ctx_release) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + ret = ctx->teedev->desc->ops->system_ctx_request(ctx); > + if (!ret) > + ctx->system_ctx_count++; > + > + return ret; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_client_request_system_context); > + > +void tee_client_release_system_context(struct tee_context *ctx) > +{ > + if (ctx->system_ctx_count && > + ctx->teedev->desc->ops->system_ctx_release) { > + ctx->teedev->desc->ops->system_ctx_release(ctx); > + ctx->system_ctx_count--; > + } > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_client_release_system_context); > + > void tee_client_get_version(struct tee_context *ctx, > struct tee_ioctl_version_data *vers) > { > diff --git a/include/linux/tee_drv.h b/include/linux/tee_drv.h > index 17eb1c5205d3..45577256bb71 100644 > --- a/include/linux/tee_drv.h > +++ b/include/linux/tee_drv.h > @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ struct tee_shm_pool; > * non-blocking in nature. > * @cap_memref_null: flag indicating if the TEE Client support shared > * memory buffer with a NULL pointer. > + * @system_ctx_count: Number of system invocation contexts provisioned for > + * this TEE client or 0. > */ > struct tee_context { > struct tee_device *teedev; > @@ -55,6 +57,7 @@ struct tee_context { > bool releasing; > bool supp_nowait; > bool cap_memref_null; > + unsigned int system_ctx_count; Does it make sense for a tee_context to reserve more than one system context/thread? I wonder if keeping track on this shouldn't be done in a driver specific struct, perhaps struct optee_context_data for OP-TEE. > }; > > struct tee_param_memref { > @@ -90,6 +93,8 @@ struct tee_param { > * @supp_send: called for supplicant to send a response > * @shm_register: register shared memory buffer in TEE > * @shm_unregister: unregister shared memory buffer in TEE > + * @system_ctx_request: Request provisioning of a new system context in TEE > + * @system_ctx_release: Release a provisioned system context in TEE > */ > struct tee_driver_ops { > void (*get_version)(struct tee_device *teedev, > @@ -112,6 +117,8 @@ struct tee_driver_ops { > struct page **pages, size_t num_pages, > unsigned long start); > int (*shm_unregister)(struct tee_context *ctx, struct tee_shm *shm); > + int (*system_ctx_request)(struct tee_context *ctx); > + void (*system_ctx_release)(struct tee_context *ctx); > }; > > /** > @@ -397,6 +404,20 @@ tee_client_open_context(struct tee_context *start, > */ > void tee_client_close_context(struct tee_context *ctx); > > +/** > + * tee_client_request_system_context() - Close a TEE context Copy & paste error > + * @ctx: TEE context to close > + * > + * @return 0 on success else an error code > + */ > +int tee_client_request_system_context(struct tee_context *ctx); > + > +/** > + * tee_client_release_system_context() - Release a reserved system exec context Please drop "exec", it's not mentioned anywhere else. Thanks, Jens > + * @ctx: TEE context reference > + */ > +void tee_client_release_system_context(struct tee_context *ctx); > + > /** > * tee_client_get_version() - Query version of TEE > * @ctx: TEE context to TEE to query > -- > 2.25.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel