From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8541CC43217 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 19:45:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=F4zGINjCQ3WRISwLucph0jGxid1kLtrldLZtPRomspA=; b=zlQcon8Gqzng3z Dzw8s581AFZ/EN+3wLOzbabmJwJG8EhZkJQ1cbXBJPp8CiWCpcjzzWXhon9MmyiVTMt9htqe9t/MZ 5D0vzyDINHRlhByg0+JitFI/yARXKBofU3sys5OjPLKAISRV6l0H9l9Y34XvJTMjyhUiLRjB/qNF4 9egfDPO2C3SACODV9FejB35Iclh6BYSiAc/hUKkb2Yt5CjNbmOmhwJaB6mpZOp4jc+DGg7kBZkKRH zUMh7HgY9exBuWxnJ4XnijkrsPGyjkPHteSMpHk4YwpOdkldXt7AtrRYsneGWo1J1K9p84laaZgzk A57WnLsufFAcCLJ4pZrQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oiheJ-009BzL-Q1; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 19:44:15 +0000 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oiheG-009Bxs-LN for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 19:44:14 +0000 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ea9733e705329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ea:9733:e705:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 44D151EC04E2; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:44:04 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1665603844; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=0lkbuGF1cUc6jdBP5s8VreY4VLDUfdNY1Y4avB/6+Kc=; b=lIgRfrrcOA6GN8T/OhYp3mma1hONKAs0CScRwn7Z/L6qwqZS2gZKUkQrq4km+3dpjVHSp6 R2C3FzXWdYJceWU9a7UQCk4NLVJb+AM//DMcIgYVYoev0MRASbBi4gc9fyhBPKbYbovpvw W0KAMcsrbzNZlBBON/8R/bY8FyUZt7o= Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 21:44:00 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Serge Semin Cc: Serge Semin , Michal Simek , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tony Luck , James Morse , Robert Richter , Alexey Malahov , Michail Ivanov , Pavel Parkhomenko , Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri , Manish Narani , Dinh Nguyen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 14/17] EDAC/synopsys: Detach Zynq DDRC controller support Message-ID: References: <20220929232712.12202-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20220929232712.12202-15-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> <20221006121740.ksugoodbagr45fky@mobilestation> <20221008004224.owqbzbdctclua2hb@mobilestation> <20221012192743.ihy4nidkzxweqebj@mobilestation> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221012192743.ihy4nidkzxweqebj@mobilestation> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221012_124412_877494_6F3388B4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.01 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 10:27:43PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > ... inter-device parts of the core. The registration procedure is > protected by the mutex and RCU. So it seems as the EDAC core developer Seems, schmeems. As I said already, EDAC has always had a single chipset-specific driver. Period. So if one needs to run more than one chipset-specific driver concurrently, then the whole code needs to be audited because this hasn't been done before. > If it has never needed to, then please explain why did you let the > Synopsys EDAC driver being accepted like that then? I think I already did. > In my case it's a single EDAC driver per-chip. There can be several > DDR-controllers installed on the same SoC, but all of them of the same > type (Synopsys DW uMCTL2 v2.61a). Good. I'll look at your patches as time allows. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel