From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>,
Craig Topper <craig.topper@sifive.com>,
Philip Reames <listmail@philipreames.com>,
jh@jhauser.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: NWFPE: avoid compiler-generated __aeabi_uldivmod
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 10:04:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0hFCzVck/zBFwiX@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221010225342.3903590-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 03:53:42PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> clang-15's ability to elide loops completely became more aggressive when
> it can deduce how a variable is being updated in a loop. Counting down
> one variable by an increment of another can be replaced by a modulo
> operation.
>
> For 64b variables on 32b ARM EABI targets, this can result in the
> compiler generating calls to __aeabi_uldivmod, which it does for a do
> while loop in float64_rem().
>
> For the kernel, we'd generally prefer that developers not open code 64b
> division via binary / operators and instead use the more explicit
> helpers from div64.h. On arm-linux-gnuabi targets, failure to do so can
> result in linkage failures due to undefined references to
> __aeabi_uldivmod().
>
> While developers can avoid open coding divisions on 64b variables, the
> compiler doesn't know that the Linux kernel has a partial implementation
> of a compiler runtime (--rtlib) to enforce this convention.
>
> It's also undecidable for the compiler whether the code in question
> would be faster to execute the loop vs elide it and do the 64b division.
>
> While I actively avoid using the internal -mllvm command line flags, I
> think we get better code than using barrier() here, which will force
> reloads+spills in the loop for all toolchains.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1666
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
I built ARCH=arm allmodconfig + CONFIG_WERROR=n without this patch and
saw the link failure then applied it and the error went away. Thanks for
all the investigation done into fixing this! I think you put this in the
patch tracker already but just for posterity:
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile b/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile
> index 303400fa2cdf..2aec85ab1e8b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile
> @@ -11,3 +11,9 @@ nwfpe-y += fpa11.o fpa11_cpdo.o fpa11_cpdt.o \
> entry.o
>
> nwfpe-$(CONFIG_FPE_NWFPE_XP) += extended_cpdo.o
> +
> +# Try really hard to avoid generating calls to __aeabi_uldivmod() from
> +# float64_rem() due to loop elision.
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +CFLAGS_softfloat.o += -mllvm -replexitval=never
> +endif
> --
> 2.38.0.rc2.412.g84df46c1b4-goog
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-13 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-16 0:16 [PATCH] arm: lib: implement aeabi_uldivmod via div64_u64_rem Nick Desaulniers
2022-07-16 9:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-10-10 21:23 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-10 22:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-10-10 22:34 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-10 22:53 ` [PATCH] ARM: NWFPE: avoid compiler-generated __aeabi_uldivmod Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-11 11:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-10-13 17:04 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-07-18 16:50 ` [PATCH] arm: lib: implement aeabi_uldivmod via div64_u64_rem kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y0hFCzVck/zBFwiX@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=craig.topper@sifive.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jh@jhauser.us \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=listmail@philipreames.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox