Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>,
	Craig Topper <craig.topper@sifive.com>,
	Philip Reames <listmail@philipreames.com>,
	jh@jhauser.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: NWFPE: avoid compiler-generated __aeabi_uldivmod
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 10:04:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0hFCzVck/zBFwiX@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221010225342.3903590-1-ndesaulniers@google.com>

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 03:53:42PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> clang-15's ability to elide loops completely became more aggressive when
> it can deduce how a variable is being updated in a loop. Counting down
> one variable by an increment of another can be replaced by a modulo
> operation.
> 
> For 64b variables on 32b ARM EABI targets, this can result in the
> compiler generating calls to __aeabi_uldivmod, which it does for a do
> while loop in float64_rem().
> 
> For the kernel, we'd generally prefer that developers not open code 64b
> division via binary / operators and instead use the more explicit
> helpers from div64.h. On arm-linux-gnuabi targets, failure to do so can
> result in linkage failures due to undefined references to
> __aeabi_uldivmod().
> 
> While developers can avoid open coding divisions on 64b variables, the
> compiler doesn't know that the Linux kernel has a partial implementation
> of a compiler runtime (--rtlib) to enforce this convention.
> 
> It's also undecidable for the compiler whether the code in question
> would be faster to execute the loop vs elide it and do the 64b division.
> 
> While I actively avoid using the internal -mllvm command line flags, I
> think we get better code than using barrier() here, which will force
> reloads+spills in the loop for all toolchains.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1666
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

I built ARCH=arm allmodconfig + CONFIG_WERROR=n without this patch and
saw the link failure then applied it and the error went away. Thanks for
all the investigation done into fixing this! I think you put this in the
patch tracker already but just for posterity:

Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>

> ---
>  arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile b/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile
> index 303400fa2cdf..2aec85ab1e8b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/Makefile
> @@ -11,3 +11,9 @@ nwfpe-y				+= fpa11.o fpa11_cpdo.o fpa11_cpdt.o \
>  				   entry.o
>  
>  nwfpe-$(CONFIG_FPE_NWFPE_XP)	+= extended_cpdo.o
> +
> +# Try really hard to avoid generating calls to __aeabi_uldivmod() from
> +# float64_rem() due to loop elision.
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +CFLAGS_softfloat.o	+= -mllvm -replexitval=never
> +endif
> -- 
> 2.38.0.rc2.412.g84df46c1b4-goog
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-13 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-16  0:16 [PATCH] arm: lib: implement aeabi_uldivmod via div64_u64_rem Nick Desaulniers
2022-07-16  9:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-10-10 21:23   ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-10 22:13     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-10-10 22:34       ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-10 22:53         ` [PATCH] ARM: NWFPE: avoid compiler-generated __aeabi_uldivmod Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-11 11:01           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-10-13 17:04           ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-07-18 16:50 ` [PATCH] arm: lib: implement aeabi_uldivmod via div64_u64_rem kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y0hFCzVck/zBFwiX@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=craig.topper@sifive.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=jh@jhauser.us \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=listmail@philipreames.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox