From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44BFEC4332F for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:59:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=7K49rQCmX6hGWD7TvcErdCf4PIGt39JsBLjb6FhkNf8=; b=cHFbBBGJWkHeWh4dOK3RhGkQfE UCCwZ0UobXwRnfrcTbHRYAdD7v8jsqcLJaiL8Urhll64Ucii0qODKZD71CmGH+ut4uVF4xB6uQb81 8jbs1Ghwg/rPlxDUDF+nBYmpUfE8I32EA9J6/MnhKyBYXTg99vVdr6lTlKPI03neUVOG//DTPmyaO QIOKrdpD5EpygVhYimA3xsSaEQ6fU7wrZMhf+luxSr56iBoj43eHwYy5uMjArgUn6KDgGe72pP85z WwjztNEhp+zPrdY2eRDcRuddpl4taCPmkQuWxqhvHoXjQSuZfzvJxS7fuSh0Z7bM7d0nZAyPT35j9 5LOqs47g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oj2Tf-00Casw-0d; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:58:39 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oj2Tb-00Cark-9E for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:58:36 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E27F9B8204A; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 729ADC433D7; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:58:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1665683911; bh=gykBv/voDOLMOmDi5TXZDsNMZpz9IcOKM8hem8HE/MY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q2ipYTHM/k3OfNAL4J7NWE26Vp29G7I69XXySU+uqE51XLQTUDYSeERtUNnN6uv+j hICsC7VpdWUZ5ucxI92rqkM2KJjcqNt5Hnht2RtNwO2xRKhXiz9byk9qPH1lJ9VOQV FVdoRyvHn/59oSm4/Xcdhn7jtoy2gLf4OBCG055FBjqgOfqWqrrEmkWKd3sdgfKke9 DJJSE1Pyd4HX+Gk/SPQBBRPd3OgmNYMl7rExCkrbofTFiXlRNT/ZoYUSo9nZuIINhp S+n8FUnb1mi8rSpeBqP5NLb6TDghw5hjOW6C1aofnFFyFPEMsER4sPYC3Xt351zqng wYgOy2nA38lAQ== Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:58:30 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , will@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 15/46] kselftest/arm64: Allow larger buffers in get_signal_context() Message-ID: References: <20221011145015.1622882-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20221011145015.1622882-15-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221013_105835_485926_D3111C37 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.43 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 04:04:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:49:43AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> From: Mark Brown >> >> [ Upstream commit 38150a6204c731a4846786682e500d132571fd82 ] >> >> In order to allow testing of signal contexts that overflow the base signal >> frame allow callers to pass the buffer size for the user context into >> get_signal_context(). No functional change. > >This doesn't obviously make sense independently, even by the relaxed >standards stable uses these days? I can drop this one, or, are there maybe additional patches we do want to take? -- Thanks, Sasha _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel