From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99F7C4332F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:25:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=gkztR9wo4LGUOacmmVyAnDgaXuO+ARbEu+NSccxw2gA=; b=dJr9N2u41jBkVc Tw0zVmtTMWvPUNAMaBfAsNFHOHua8nbiLIbXUv4z0xEtcB2KgnH7It1DbjdvK2DufcxQmxwC5YcIj 9cCMkEgOKekp2NzjRTTDLLyB9L7qCS/J0iENGlM++qyK8xTuHIBXPwttX5Zm/b2fSEWFXHH+Pc8HF qakrsl3AXcPCSGVihOgELssxnwwVhUivZFDU+QGpq9oU2nnTRjayQejLWK8rpsTKjYP7P+DB6eMGR WhrPypLEaov3gVp4L5jckFo0gfFcGtyVoYD7rSPKPZbD3Ru83Q2s6EHQORNYOiUj5L58rrQvj2vjX QMVzEcYbInZINTyiX33A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1orzJ6-00DiG6-5m; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:24:44 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1orzJ3-00DiEV-D0 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:24:42 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02C55B80E80; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16634C433D6; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:24:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1667816676; bh=UN7DouiwZqYbJ8Kr8Qr8SGnYbyDiieyj0GbObFbu7iQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=2MTd/A1Ew2D4OPV0ruvc5fxUZPGR815QOblpJsTkMNr8ahAJqslZDU1da23xkftW9 K4sRt5VgmAYQy9P0LBm2zV3bvwg19FKj7inzpr6tAHxL0tFdHIOT6kJwmTM5RwG0AP uT4NjHqaETDkGF+QDn32o4Ft6J0az6VbWqSzUvS0= Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:24:33 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Suzuki K Poulose Cc: James Clark , stable@kernel.org, Aishwarya TCV , Cristian Marussi , Mike Leach , Mathieu Poirier , Leo Yan , Alexander Shishkin , coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10] coresight: cti: Fix hang in cti_disable_hw() Message-ID: References: <20221102112003.2318583-1-james.clark@arm.com> <4d44d2c8-a8ec-1729-d3cc-9ae8beb48045@arm.com> <99b25aab-ba87-b875-9f5f-c7dd9444b8c8@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <99b25aab-ba87-b875-9f5f-c7dd9444b8c8@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221107_022441_608203_2FE749CE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.11 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 09:59:24AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 07/11/2022 09:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 09:23:26AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > > > On 07/11/2022 09:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 11:20:03AM +0000, James Clark wrote: > > > > > commit 6746eae4bbaddcc16b40efb33dab79210828b3ce upstream. > > > > > > > > Isn't this commit 665c157e0204176023860b51a46528ba0ba62c33 instead? > > > > > > This was reverted in commit d76308f03ee1 and pushed in later > > > with fixups as 6746eae4bbadd. > > > > So which should be applied? > > Sorry, this particular post is a backport for v5.10 stable branch. > > > > > confused, > > Now I am too. What is expected here ? My understanding is, we > should stick the "upstream" commit that is getting backported > at the beginning of the commit description. In that sense, > the commit id in this patch looks correct to me. Please let > me know if this is not the case. > > As such, this is only for 5.10.x branch. The rest are taken > care of. > > Please let us know if we are something missing. We already have commit 665c157e0204176023860b51a46528ba0ba62c33 queued up in the 5.10 stable queue. Is that not correct? It has the same subject line as this one. Still confused. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel