public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: use .arch directives instead of assembler command line flags
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:30:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2qgTyFcPdnNfkpj@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014201354.3190007-3-ndesaulniers@google.com>

Hi Russell,

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:13:52PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Similar to commit a6c30873ee4a ("ARM: 8989/1: use .fpu assembler
> directives instead of assembler arguments").
> 
> GCC and GNU binutils support setting the "sub arch" via -march=,
> -Wa,-march, target function attribute, and .arch assembler directive.
> 
> Clang was missing support for -Wa,-march=, but this was implemented in
> clang-13.
> 
> The behavior of both GCC and Clang is to
> prefer -Wa,-march= over -march= for assembler and assembler-with-cpp
> sources, but Clang will warn about the -march= being unused.
> 
> clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-march=armv6k'
> [-Wunused-command-line-argument]
> 
> Since most assembler is non-conditionally assembled with one sub arch
> (modulo arch/arm/delay-loop.S which conditionally is assembled as armv4
> based on CONFIG_ARCH_RPC, and arch/arm/mach-at91/pm-suspend.S which is
> conditionally assembled as armv7-a based on CONFIG_CPU_V7), prefer the
> .arch assembler directive.
> 
> Add a few more instances found in compile testing as found by Arnd and
> Nathan.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d51c699b9e2ebc5bcfdbe85c74cc871426333d4
> Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48894
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1195
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1315
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> ---
> Changes v3 -> v4:
> * Add .arch armv7-a to arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep.S as per Nathan.
>   https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1315#issuecomment-1255646893
> * Add Nathan's SB tag.

I noticed that this series appears to be partially applied in
next-20221108:

59247fe730db ARM: 9265/1: pass -march= only to compiler
bc21212c5564 ARM: 9264/1: only use -mtp=cp15 for the compiler
5aa4860eb50f ARM: 9262/1: remove lazy evaluation in Makefile

This patch (submitted as 9263/1) is needed by 9265/1; without it, builds
are going to break:

https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2HGSpQMAKxJuaMAz2ZZc1UgUvvu/build.log

Was there a problem with applying this patch or just an oversight? It
would be great to get this whole series applied so that we can turn
-Wunused-command-line-argument into a hard error.

Cheers,
Nathan

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-08 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-14 20:13 [PATCH v4 0/4] pass -march= only to compiler Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] ARM: remove lazy evaluation in Makefile Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:18   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: use .arch directives instead of assembler command line flags Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:19   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-08 18:30   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-11-08 18:37     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-08 18:40       ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: only use -mtp=cp15 for the compiler Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:20   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: pass -march= only to compiler Nick Desaulniers
2022-10-14 21:21   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-14 20:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2qgTyFcPdnNfkpj@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox