From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F9A8C433FE for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 18:41:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=k5zDClh7CZxvs11iAEOdvBvL6cz4zpZ8kOYcLLsPjA4=; b=pXDB2ZnVkOErvO hq4Avuo5mwv6gtsiiBxonM1tIPOLc3SAxfU2v4iV863C8Y3QNC+XYJdMydSjbwp7OaIbPBP/ygi7n JxbM0W1AlWlxYhnHDk/iCRfSk7QSSktWlSRo9cSfhvtZ7gbpWB4oXQjdN2h9Cda4BG2ZJbOyI2N3l WYuGFhqCSPYBBoPyEJ9L7prLmG9lxf8pS3qvgV+Fo2MuV4UMg4S/aCFu6kEMD4abw+gdD3+HLAhqY +dgncrmDHZrTsYR0OovJbOypZbm1lxAoJRCtI5QNnKA0T16QWuuHkTLadACQ9gQpH1dLhYR7Sx3XT Ee/IDw07YEl+0bSVWLHg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1osTWY-007XsN-0G; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 18:40:38 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1osTWV-007XqN-Bt for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 18:40:36 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA79561730; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 18:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C79BFC433D6; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 18:40:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1667932830; bh=jjF5Yq9ooqSu67PuLpajmGKnq/YI9I38yCrZ+QF9xZE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=KZ6foW7RZBnob6gVPZtIrJJitq3jOcU+nBe2WkHctOKYtOQCBSY075bEAbQFXqCjQ XlEWSch7hROb/9RaSzzx0oQnKSRUMUJ7WC2P0MSi4jzCw3oPYRms6QaoBmltptA0IO eCgqshcOF3sWgXCVK8Hcc1/oweHVGST4EK772VvU88G9iOlp9ospIliYzHFYcCCGrA ccs3jvVz6H5Maot5k/LYW0vMy65PO5XGwdOSowZCyA1gidYaZvqO8nZ0RcQNsmysA+ EMCgL7VfIZ6Bkof7EawCjcLRfN5tke8FYJMeUDLWch8D8BBG/iNYDdZs8FkcItPDbB y0JFcCOqKsjxg== Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:40:28 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Arnd Bergmann , Ard Biesheuvel , Masahiro Yamada , Linus Walleij , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: use .arch directives instead of assembler command line flags Message-ID: References: <20221014201354.3190007-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20221014201354.3190007-3-ndesaulniers@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221108_104035_464956_F9DC74ED X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.53 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 06:37:02PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 11:30:39AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > I noticed that this series appears to be partially applied in > > next-20221108: > > > > 59247fe730db ARM: 9265/1: pass -march= only to compiler > > bc21212c5564 ARM: 9264/1: only use -mtp=cp15 for the compiler > > 5aa4860eb50f ARM: 9262/1: remove lazy evaluation in Makefile > > > > This patch (submitted as 9263/1) is needed by 9265/1; without it, builds > > are going to break: > > > > https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2HGSpQMAKxJuaMAz2ZZc1UgUvvu/build.log > > > > Was there a problem with applying this patch or just an oversight? It > > would be great to get this whole series applied so that we can turn > > -Wunused-command-line-argument into a hard error. > > Patching 9263/1... > git apply --whitespace=fix -p1 --index --check > /tmp/pdb.726086 2>&1 > exited with non-zero status: 256 > error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Makefile:1 > error: arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Makefile: patch does not apply > > The problem appears to be: > > 84fc86360623 ARM: make ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM user-visible > > which is not in my misc branch. I've applied your patch using GNU > patch with a fuzz of 2, and the resulting diff looks sensible. I'll > push it out later this evening. > > Thanks for the heads-up. Perfect, thanks a lot for the quick response! I figured it was something like that. I will keep an eye out for any additional breakage and follow up with patches or additional emails as necessary. Cheers, Nathan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel