From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, lars.povlsen@microchip.com,
Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com, daniel.machon@microchip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: microchip: sparx5: remove useless code in sparx5_qos_init()
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:08:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3ZARsVC14JUa9i8@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221117145820.2898968-1-luwei32@huawei.com>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:58:20PM +0800, Lu Wei wrote:
> There is no need to define variable ret, so remove it
> and return sparx5_leak_groups_init() directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c
> index 1e79d0ef0cb8..2f39300d52cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c
> @@ -383,13 +383,7 @@ static int sparx5_leak_groups_init(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
>
> int sparx5_qos_init(struct sparx5 *sparx5)
> {
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = sparx5_leak_groups_init(sparx5);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - return 0;
> + return sparx5_leak_groups_init(sparx5);
> }
Does sparx5_qos_init() even make sense given that all it does it call
a function?
Please don't do the minimum needed to make your robot happy. Think
about the code, the change, is this the best fix?
Andrew
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-17 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 14:58 [patch net-next] net: microchip: sparx5: remove useless code in sparx5_qos_init() Lu Wei
2022-11-17 14:08 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2022-11-17 14:21 ` Daniel.Machon
2022-11-17 20:14 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-11-18 8:47 ` Daniel.Machon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3ZARsVC14JUa9i8@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luwei32@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox