From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7769DC4332F for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 18:17:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=JsES+qajIxZ0pnm0Fa4Ah459c/B+ox11nRoWcB7r08g=; b=alIXIxrrIiKnJc EhCl2gemryH3N8eNUJHmnoQDopTnz/Vx2vK9ro7NJsaUNxkf5X9OHpduEdbWxWucAir9Mc61kFhS7 DeCgINwIwsDn8Xv1Sn5x71XNZfIoNlx2OLhvFkQ6O4RsNI+IYesXvMTSaDictBKgbI73DDQXv729d Iz6Skj5ya5HIFcWoGtjlmnSnXMNuqGEMgpr3Fx0GXaYVqxl0b+CWJwWp6+5upZ3EnjU/V4MFsT6NX PM2R9WGZJHafGypGzLBww1X61V+i6sW6jO8YJfKX5hmXIz/vUCfrsKz2SSNpO2SITjltfekdPJCM0 O+kfRLNMXuZ3zvZjAwwg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p2G0h-008JlE-UM; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:16:12 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-01.comm2000.it ([212.97.32.64]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p2G0e-008Jiz-Kr; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:16:10 +0000 Received: from francesco-nb.int.toradex.com (31-10-206-125.static.upc.ch [31.10.206.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: francesco@dolcini.it) by smtp-out-01.comm2000.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B475C843CEA; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:15:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mailserver.it; s=mailsrv; t=1670264165; bh=i2fxvVG/OMTVFtDkYPsQVjpZTCVwhtrudWILsoMensE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Slx6qj40YwzzbDrVsAY6atWaqvM2owKNtyiaEGzxmv7VjuTv7Ux2jCHugIGNX/L2Y 5pajr20sSnaYTyLnrxrneiiWpiLE8/6Mz+Y6K2IWW2IzUc4SrnXuZd28v6bLMjs5bs byyWPoQqTKxEVuouuWjllj5CKL/nFXIy08ypTlDNEfGT5scozi51wdDsnJx52Ztdfh mjLr3bZbOyeyXijH9858SA6F4U+pcqa6THkze74ZBsVSHZXyInB9Jh+2BpkGTjQ16C GUDfHB6H7ozCnrlhnccVEKiLMo+IFhqFQG3etCgUjDuKpbued4bF+D4uzvnEsjrUjF ZO0bBgVpwgbTg== Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:15:56 +0100 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Marek Vasut , Miquel Raynal Cc: Miquel Raynal , Francesco Dolcini , Shawn Guo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Francesco Dolcini , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Revert "ARM: dts: imx7: Fix NAND controller size-cells" Message-ID: References: <20221205152327.26881-1-francesco@dolcini.it> <0aa2d48b-35a0-1781-f265-0387d213bdd6@denx.de> <20221205185859.433d6cbf@xps-13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221205_101608_851330_CE2B1655 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.57 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 07:07:14PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 12/5/22 18:58, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > marex@denx.de wrote on Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:26:53 +0100: > > , it's not > > complex to do, there are plenty of examples. This would be IMHO a > > better step ahead rather than just a cell change. Anyway, I don't mind > > reverting this once we've sorted this mess out and fixed U-Boot. > > Won't we still have issues with older bootloader versions which paste > partitions directly into this &gpmi {} node, and which needs to be fixed up > in the parser in the end ? Yes, I think so. While I do agree on printk warning and deprecated functions and use more modern and less problematic stuff, this should not come at the cost of failing the boot on board using some old U-Boot version. Francesco _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel