linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] arm64/cpufeature: Detect PE support for FEAT_NMI
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:32:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y45HMaXwUcSHEplv@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86r0xdlodg.wl-maz@kernel.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1384 bytes --]

On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 06:03:07PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_NMI
> > +	{
> > +		.desc = "Non-maskable Interrupts",
> > +		.capability = ARM64_HAS_NMI,
> > +		.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE,

> PSEUDO_NMI uses ARM64_CPUCAP_STRICT_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE. What is the
> rational for using a different policy here?

I couldn't identify any issues that the kernel would have if the feature
was present in the hardware but unused so I didn't see the need to be
additionally restrictive.  TBH I'm not 100% clear why the _STRICT is
there for pseudo NMIs, it seemed a bit out of scope for this series to
try to clean that up though.

> The whole thing is way too restrictive: KVM definitely needs to know
> that the feature exists, even if there is no use for it in the host
> kernel. There is no reason why guests shouldn't be able to use this
> even if the host doesn't care about it.

> Which means you need two properties: one that advertises the
> availability of the feature, and one that makes use of it in the
> kernel.

To be clear I think what you're looking for here is a capability that
omits the cross-check with pseudo NMIs rather than something that's
strictly checking the hardware (so ID register overrides will still
apply)?  I've done that locally, my tree currently has capabilites
HAS_NMI and USES_NMI.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-05 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-12 15:16 [PATCH v2 00/14] arm64/nmi: Support for FEAT_NMI Mark Brown
2022-11-12 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] arm64/booting: Document boot requirements " Mark Brown
2022-11-12 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] arm64/sysreg: Add definition for ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 Mark Brown
2022-11-12 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] arm64/sysreg: Add definition of ISR_EL1 Mark Brown
2022-12-05 16:45   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-12 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] arm64/sysreg: Add definitions for immediate versions of MSR ALLINT Mark Brown
2022-12-05 16:38   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-05 17:11     ` Mark Brown
2022-12-07 19:18       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-07 19:42         ` Mark Brown
2022-11-12 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] arm64/asm: Introduce assembly macros for managing ALLINT Mark Brown
2022-12-05 17:29   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-05 18:24     ` Mark Brown
2022-12-07 19:14       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-12 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] arm64/hyp-stub: Enable access to ALLINT Mark Brown
2022-12-05 17:50   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-12 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] arm64/idreg: Add an override for FEAT_NMI Mark Brown
2022-11-12 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] arm64/cpufeature: Detect PE support " Mark Brown
2022-12-05 18:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-05 19:32     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-12-07 19:06       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-12 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] KVM: arm64: Hide FEAT_NMI from guests Mark Brown
2022-12-05 18:06   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-05 19:03     ` Mark Brown
2022-12-07 19:03       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-07 19:33         ` Mark Brown
2022-11-12 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] arm64/nmi: Manage masking for superpriority interrupts along with DAIF Mark Brown
2022-12-05 18:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-05 20:52     ` Mark Brown
2022-12-08 17:19   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-12-12 14:03     ` Mark Brown
2022-12-13  8:37       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-12-13 13:15         ` Mark Brown
2022-12-15 13:32           ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-12 14:40   ` Mark Rutland
2022-12-15 13:21     ` Mark Brown
2022-11-12 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] arm64/irq: Document handling of FEAT_NMI in irqflags.h Mark Brown
2022-11-12 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] arm64/nmi: Add handling of superpriority interrupts as NMIs Mark Brown
2022-12-07 11:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-07 13:24     ` Mark Brown
2022-12-07 18:57       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-07 19:15         ` Mark Brown
2022-11-12 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] arm64/nmi: Add Kconfig for NMI Mark Brown
2022-11-12 15:17 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] irqchip/gic-v3: Implement FEAT_GICv3_NMI support Mark Brown
2022-12-07 15:20   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-02 18:42 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] arm64/nmi: Support for FEAT_NMI Marc Zyngier
2022-12-03  8:25   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-12-03  9:45     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y45HMaXwUcSHEplv@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=Sami.Mujawar@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).