From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9863BC4321E for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 08:28:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=P+fJ14Jprb2TAmgVuIDPftmg3bz6KD2O+steFv5gymY=; b=KDf52ydXNlIuzN hy+0PMbhSVZ59VEVHUUiEpt6Ijp5mKDyDHCslENkTVI9N6spmmgwkPi9VwUIP8JLFQ9OfDwYkiSj0 XoVzX353Xo4oDH6ayylvzZ6ayM3J2T8vFUdYRLQ2sXhitQ095he+NaD1k7GzebGJE1MO8+RcREuHp XycTdbq03UGqMdlNY17FowSJzwg9/KM7VgDzi5SzYngX1qbascDpWgUC16gOOWW3pD5yQVfKsPWi1 xs/7pPJkMJ9CjpEj9d5o8/7NQo+Z48c6cRVEvybJMACJrZ/wWTl/3mQUNB7uUMgR2CFBB8e/kAqw9 h1rqmb5Oep8lOPmrfweA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0euT-005q4E-Du; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:27:09 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([145.40.73.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0euE-005pvg-8U for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2022 08:26:56 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D083CE1C48; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 08:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF528C433D6; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 08:26:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1669883210; bh=QUQeSgrutik/8pe2d8be3o1H58jPmKkhXZFIw6Ik2kc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Md+MZxrRPwCp1G5I8QzwH7U/PWE7L7jEqIo7f09qti2RUpHabMgbt3ocqcgWdSC9r PDbFiKn1MwdtHXuT9vXi9GuqnPwlzcsgwP4rZQH/qG3BArvSR8VCHY56QkmV+X4GRn Ra/jmj3ssv2QCewohK+aH6cDJE4AyBO5eonWeO74= Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:03:01 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Daehwan Jung Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alim Akhtar , Mathias Nyman , Arnd Bergmann , Linus Walleij , Colin Ian King , Artur Bujdoso , Juergen Gross , Tomer Maimon , "open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , "open list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , open list , sc.suh@samsung.com, taehyun.cho@samsung.com, jh0801.jung@samsung.com, eomji.oh@samsung.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] add xhci-exynos to support Samsung Exynos SOCs Message-ID: References: <1669860811-171746-1-git-send-email-dh10.jung@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1669860811-171746-1-git-send-email-dh10.jung@samsung.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221201_002654_516357_D3FE12F4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.62 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:13:29AM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote: > This patchset is to support xHCI Controller on Samsung Exynos SOCs. > > Daehwan Jung (2): > dt-bindings: usb: samsung,exynos-xhci: support Samsung Exynos xHCI > Controller > usb: host: add xhci-exynos to support Exynos SOCs Why is this a "RFC" and not a real submission? What needs to be done to it to get it into mergable shape? And thank you for posting this, I've wanted to see this merged for a very long time given the millions of devices already using it. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel