From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645E3C4321E for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 17:21:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=o2Z//Xw+x/sFqPe6HZe2ubyUj/iC1EDvr7ZAl5PL3CU=; b=aSopXLYiWBfjyU L/jEhIlmeOV0wh/gUBg/DKdwTeJguPAYMoiXXiMSAIQ6x3HJ2A9ESnI7LhNHkRF9d1FSoXWOa/VFj CMAbNwn48948PKfyIUYbA9ujA97MizKmhvtVvppx4LNvd9pJOEIeIKDv94UYlkA5pWiKXx6JveM8d 2Prpgn1NJ36Y8L2A7FGwC79tQ4QgyW9zVDIH53l/zAqJNMItKVIm+wEIAljAaeuCliw4vc4prfpqQ aD/nQXG1yiN70du12og39hMaCC114cVaOG3r6fWWBMV8rMdCMqbLqjBhvi5xTKMpVKhXZuT7/FSN0 EfYQWRAbTzrNj3YUpCfQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p19iK-000K52-8n; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:20:40 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-07.comm2000.it ([212.97.32.77]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p19iG-000K2X-UU; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:20:38 +0000 Received: from francesco-nb.int.toradex.com (93-49-2-63.ip317.fastwebnet.it [93.49.2.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: francesco@dolcini.it) by smtp-out-07.comm2000.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3F513C31E4; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:20:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mailserver.it; s=mailsrv; t=1670001627; bh=cH5MF3icabPo56tRMEaFmIjjcbufvHO2gDgZKmAPA40=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=WOXGC40yBg1RGHn0TkZukuO+oObGCeWvEZufmL/y1R9MkQVnSELBUvHi1GOkN1TTJ WHsnAnAPrHuGtnn73gg8267nxdrTl63oOX96rZgYp6VHy7ZF18fvorhleZO1anDONp vCcocUxN53If5kyWtS+pma3Jxu4Vn3QjEXdlXXuvimBwlmYpvZb3FaZiN6/6fG6oXS nNjWbASVZ5Zb1f+MvO0I7EEt8ndd/LxYvO1m+OiHwa/dwJdlyPo006b+OW2Wgzr13Y Ge93k29r56VwX4VjKDVibsB75025uvbOjwk6HxsHPi16w2VZikBoamXgaQNWpafMBo ZEzwwX106228w== Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:20:02 +0100 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Miquel Raynal Cc: Marek Vasut , Francesco Dolcini , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Francesco Dolcini , Shawn Guo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: parsers: ofpart: Fix parsing when size-cells is 0 Message-ID: References: <20221202115327.4475d3a2@xps-13> <20221202150556.14c5ae43@xps-13> <2b6fc52d-60b9-d0f4-ab91-4cf7a8095999@denx.de> <20221202160030.1b8d0b8a@xps-13> <223b7a4e-3aff-8070-7387-c77d2ded1dd6@denx.de> <20221202164904.08d750df@xps-13> <0503c46d-c385-74f5-f762-51d87a5ebaff@denx.de> <20221202174255.2c1cb2ff@xps-13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221202174255.2c1cb2ff@xps-13> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221202_092037_135349_245FAB1A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 05:42:55PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Please also do it with the NAND chip described. If, when the NAND chip > is described U-Boot tries to create partitions in the controller node, > then the situation is even worse than I thought. But I believe It's like that for U-Boot older than v2022.04 ... and IMO we cannot ignore it. Said that from the code U-Boot looks into a `partition{}` node only as a direct child of the nand-controller, if there is a nand-chip in between the nand-controller{} and the partitions{} it will just ignore it. I could try to see what it is doing exactly, but I would need a little bit more time, I just tried changing the DTS as wrote I got a non bootable system. Francesco _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel