public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64/sysreg: Annotate signed enumerations
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:42:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5MtIskhPZGqjA1u@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221207-arm64-sysreg-helpers-v1-4-149fa1308a23@kernel.org>

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 04:03:25PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.FP and ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.AdvSIMD are both signed enumerations,
> specify them as such in sysreg. There are other signed enumerations in the
> registers but these are the only ones for which we currently use FTR_SIGNED,
> others can be fixed up incrementally.

Can we please do that in one go (either in one patch or a set of patches in
this series)?

I appreciate that's more work up-front, but doing that will mean that all the
definitions are in a consistent state, which'll be far less error prone going
forwards -- people will *definitely* forget to change the other existing
definitions to be SIGNED if all that is hidden at the point-of-use.

If we do that, we may as well explicitly annotate the UNSIGNED enums (and those
which are purely enums without a sign) at the same time. That'll indicate that
we've reviewed each entry, and it'll make it far more obvious one must do so
when adding new entries in future.

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> index e8fb6684d7f3..16488c72827b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> @@ -846,12 +846,12 @@ Enum	27:24	GIC
>  	0b0001	IMP
>  	0b0010	V4P1
>  EndEnum
> -Enum	23:20	AdvSIMD
> +SignedEnum	23:20	AdvSIMD
>  	0b0000	IMP
>  	0b0001	FP16
>  	0b1111	NI
>  EndEnum
> -Enum	19:16	FP
> +SignedEnum	19:16	FP
>  	0b0000	IMP
>  	0b0001	FP16
>  	0b1111	NI
> 
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-09 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-08 16:03 [PATCH 0/6] arm64/cpufeature: Make use of sysreg helpers for hwcaps Mark Brown
2022-12-08 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64/cpufeature: Fix field sign for DIT hwcap detection Mark Brown
2022-12-09 12:25   ` Mark Rutland
2022-12-09 13:49     ` Mark Brown
2022-12-08 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm64/sysreg: Fix errors in 32 bit enumeration values Mark Brown
2022-12-09 12:29   ` Mark Rutland
2022-12-08 16:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64/sysreg: Allow enumerations to be declared as signed Mark Brown
2022-12-09 12:34   ` Mark Rutland
2022-12-09 13:55     ` Mark Brown
2022-12-08 16:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64/sysreg: Annotate signed enumerations Mark Brown
2022-12-09 12:42   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-12-09 13:33     ` Mark Brown
2022-12-09 16:03       ` Mark Rutland
2022-12-08 16:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64/cpufeature: Always use symbolic name for feature value in hwcaps Mark Brown
2022-12-09 12:48   ` Mark Rutland
2022-12-08 16:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64/cpufeature: Use helper macros to specify hwcaps Mark Brown
2022-12-09 12:51   ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5MtIskhPZGqjA1u@FVFF77S0Q05N \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox