From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59596C4332F for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 21:23:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=eRjK0Ga6xNIPP5ObU+ALoWn6voygyE4JdIYf4VEUQOI=; b=1M8CgRmWoACnVi /J6jFtYRRcCQSxJU/6vJnsBAMBtkRjWa422mhZXll3/w7et/+xlciuFAZRx95wjHRFHQLW0wh95th OsVtmie3GznGpQp6TxTUZy5KOTXWYcxmJm01vWlwthye2XHTjwLZTp51gPpvNdODA4jdsh9yODYnM I25HlI7A59LbLcB3c9hJ9D/uzDHfskCoKYoxzdCoyW2BRSk4YpZGHhkhR+7L5wvNWV16CYlzslHSk KQV70xiACOmVgiQMO2cZ0jXqI4D6oKnI0WwV7AkRdWPKou4qvbmWF1FC2St3vLSnPU1oX8j0xrX7e lQtG57cFsLBdQgV3vFWw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p3kpY-00BT8D-2g; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 21:22:52 +0000 Received: from out2.migadu.com ([188.165.223.204]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p3kpT-00BT4o-Tv for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 21:22:50 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 21:22:39 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1670620964; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CnVvyDm8QxAyajwUwqUqBUtv/4sqoRnfMoVGeE9EDJk=; b=VvQSAgpV2Gon3rwIJuMH4V8sDbw3cQo8amLdVLY5zVYp7r21DV6rHehDo5WkPqIJLtVGYB /NWJwK+KRAx7hIkdRzV2uvhrnyLn3Y8MrF0QAkZ2FSkgSomL4bJ8u49J/oHNwReUS8tuFY ikFbLS6qOT2Rg1QVR5KJsuBOq50ULKE= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Paolo Bonzini , Shuah Khan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Ricardo Koller , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: selftests: Correctly initialize the VA space for TTBR0_EL1 Message-ID: References: <20221209015307.1781352-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> <20221209015307.1781352-5-oliver.upton@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221209_132249_185708_0D489C49 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.17 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 08:45:01PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022, Oliver Upton wrote: > > An interesting feature of the Arm architecture is that the stage-1 MMU > > supports two distinct VA regions, controlled by TTBR{0,1}_EL1. As KVM > > selftests on arm64 only uses TTBR0_EL1, the VA space is constrained to > > [0, 2^(va_bits)). This is different from other architectures that > > allow for addressing low and high regions of the VA space from a single > > page table. > > > > KVM selftests' VA space allocator presumes the valid address range is > > split between low and high memory based the MSB, which of course is a > > poor match for arm64's TTBR0 region. > > > > Add a helper that correctly handles both addressing schemes with a > > comment describing each. > > > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton > > --- > > Thanks much! Looks awesome, especially the comment! > > Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson ty! > > .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 1 + > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++--- > > 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h > > index 6cd86da698b3..b193863d754f 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h > > @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct kvm_vm { > > struct sparsebit *vpages_mapped; > > bool has_irqchip; > > bool pgd_created; > > + bool has_split_va_space; > > vm_paddr_t ucall_mmio_addr; > > vm_paddr_t pgd; > > vm_vaddr_t gdt; > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c > > index a256ec67aff6..53d15f32f220 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c > > @@ -186,6 +186,43 @@ const struct vm_guest_mode_params vm_guest_mode_params[] = { > > _Static_assert(sizeof(vm_guest_mode_params)/sizeof(struct vm_guest_mode_params) == NUM_VM_MODES, > > "Missing new mode params?"); > > > > +/* > > + * Initializes vm->vpages_valid to match the canonical VA space of the > > + * architecture. > > + * > > + * Most architectures split the range addressed by a single page table into a > > + * low and high region based on the MSB of the VA. On architectures with this > > + * behavior the VA region spans [0, 2^(va_bits - 1)), [-(2^(va_bits - 1), -1]. > > + * > > + * arm64 is a bit different from the rest of the crowd, as the low and high > > + * regions of the VA space are addressed by distinct paging structures > > + * (TTBR{0,1}_EL1). > > Oooh, they're different CR3s in x86 terminology? Right, we can have two active table roots at any given time, each mapping their own portion of the address space. -- Thanks, Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel