From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E77C5479D for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 11:40:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=3ZutWFUcLGlYGelOeasZiN/H3ZQdM6WALGzse6h0F2A=; b=zq4v2NXOxm3dwI 2iFQ8VZt22bwMJuCauN5eckoPDL2tWS202Vr0nXotrIF3s9MX0QlAB5BSKXs5AXx4zCdqLzI1gQYb LCgPqDy8FYzkZeBNZhhKH0k58j+GRdbinaBxSLzYnSEntDSICNGcfIv8T8ON+VHiMCeBBPwAzc/K+ hK5jZHBAaAXVECcMGk5xRxnSZMTAic+a5Hm4SQ74+3vN52WPT5+nCjcg4LW7833ORdiL1oVdl0VbM S+j1nHzzOwGtVLDGmwlSHf0BCdxQb9sDRW5jsztlTR5TSdzvn7Vmpg3gY9by6oGlA3vj8RxpdJzfM JJekl7FAPPAJ/9rM1tMw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pFZRv-00B62s-HR; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 11:39:19 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pFZRs-00B61P-Rt for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 11:39:18 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDBBFEC; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 03:39:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70C6A3F587; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 03:39:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 11:39:02 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Will Deacon Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, ojeda@kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, revest@chromium.org, robert.moore@intel.com, rostedt@goodmis.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] arm64: Extend support for CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT Message-ID: References: <20230109135828.879136-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20230109135828.879136-4-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20230110204320.GA9739@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230110204320.GA9739@willie-the-truck> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230111_033916_963530_ADE27FAD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.67 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 08:43:20PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:35:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 01:58:23PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h > > > index 1436fa1cde24d..df18a3446ce82 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h > > > @@ -5,8 +5,14 @@ > > > #include > > > #endif > > > > > > -#define __ALIGN .align 2 > > > -#define __ALIGN_STR ".align 2" > > > +#if CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT > 0 > > > +#define ARM64_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT > > > +#else > > > +#define ARM64_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT 4 > > > +#endif > > > + > > > +#define __ALIGN .balign ARM64_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT > > > +#define __ALIGN_STR ".balign " #ARM64_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT > > > > Isn't that much the same as having ARM64 select FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B > > and simply removing all these lines and relying on the default > > behaviour? > > There's a proposal (with some rough performance claims) to select > FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_16B over at: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221208053649.540891-1-almasrymina@google.com > > so we could just go with that? I reckon it'd be worth having that as a separate patch atop, to split the infrastructure from the actual change, but I'm happy to go with 16B immediately if you'd prefer. It'd be nice if we could get some numbers... Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel