From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CCA2C05027 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:03:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=gzdHwhP6Dy7iTSAxSB4UHsFJrLnCB6JEpv5ika4wQtc=; b=WBhKN5r9UxWMpc Tg4SorgWDcFFvXzInnUMPKaooDbqzjaK7A9OIAn89q1CLF3/Yi3hLpNHzgxfbHDPF6H00U7/W7KPz vCzNKuYopDyVFpbubYxPm0IPEUNYI0nlBznEbm38osMTVQ/cRsKTeGCo9TvpVZbWh+Cr3Cqq8ZgAN HPAyeaV0DEMC4+Z8Ea+MJwCUbhbp+/7bd1gFCIXIPZJFcrqvhO1a532GbKSv4hDA1rUG8H5JUNnJL byoasEBHqK4UsgCHXDbgF7hJCgV2cCLCgx4jBgiQ0oWyMcxf/ybHfXVBmFc19KnXpO2Vba3wWAXyK w4M71fhJumpshZfKCDjg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pJteH-00Ge1C-90; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:01:58 +0000 Received: from mail.8bytes.org ([2a01:238:42d9:3f00:e505:6202:4f0c:f051]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pJtc3-00Gctm-Nh; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:59:41 +0000 Received: from 8bytes.org (p5b006afb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.0.106.251]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A316262C2B; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:59:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=8bytes.org; s=default; t=1674467975; bh=0KQBObUcnpg5GrqXq3hC5RyjGf2zS6TIXg2zcVgFWn0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Tr3JGNsZMXVI480xgKW5iIBnC2CS9vyEqh9gWSstha079Y/cRMHa9gi+uxnReHb5d fwek2sY7wwUJnFwFFwIvWemH12HdN0YbgdSZ2RWwC0269UqDUwGwB35CRDyXhq60AT USyIwI3wP05/5oGtUOpS94M53A08jNcPckKA5ZXpZIPRaNJ96Q+BFkTkmpgSNGCPm5 YogHT95t/tBdYhxC9Y35A2TokJihCUBd4VwOl8Pa35zfKfyCatWPy6AY7P+apvfw5a T/W6TQnG+GLz390G6KRQWUX8KnoKg77Sxn7JUzcugID6/sS1m397rjmidCEXxQK2Lj 1j8HX1fY4eNAw== Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:59:32 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Robin Murphy , Lu Baolu , Kevin Tian , Matthew Rosato , Alex Williamson , ath10k@lists.infradead.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org, Christian Borntraeger , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Niklas Schnelle , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Add a gfp parameter to iommu_map() Message-ID: References: <1-v1-6e8b3997c46d+89e-iommu_map_gfp_jgg@nvidia.com> <4fd1b194-29ef-621d-4059-a8336058f217@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230123_015939_942978_01EEDE88 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.64 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 01:53:40PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Well, having GFP parameters is not a strict kernel convention. There are > > places doing it differently and have sleeping and atomic variants of > > APIs. I have to say I like the latter more. But given that this leads to > > an invasion of API functions here which all do the same under the hood, I > > agree it is better to go with a GFP parameter here. > > Ok, I think we are done with this series, I'll stick it in linux-next > for a bit and send you a PR so the trees stay in sync This series mostly touches parts outside of IOMMUFD, so we should follow the process here and let this reach linux-next via the IOMMU tree. Please send me a new version and I will put it into a separate branch where you can pull it from. Regards, Joerg _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel