From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58DADC32793 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:55:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=W4nlwHuSiP14OpsL/F1109A8O+W9FbLcimhUMbGaoyI=; b=m7XCr0Q7jB8WLm wLHMHvnF83aBx1z3hRWrHfuKycyOdCRAYQqlad8uJoYcf87GZk645wCidZ98FR0kDzsiCHXGPHDxd V2KHSsgAjUZyt6faTfWPMLRerVWGTTWgzn4fWi9I43o+sX5+C6XawJrd2ca+okvpfgmtyK5F9tuKY M8aui7Mtxen+R3vHfSh5swlL2QrSal6vvMQBgTFCKbYOQPj7S9NwCyCEn5EdLYzmPe8EwGrBay/Qk lZwurkh4xXtBHVc6n+UFz+v1RDc7+wNPegeNlssvBSppaBDrW0SfRZRqwvei+pqk3bUwslgjM2pFw UMvv3IpDeBo0pEJLiT5g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pIBhd-001un7-In; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:54:21 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pIBha-001ulz-L6; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:54:19 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE4A0B81DD9; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B17FC433D2; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:54:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1674060855; bh=RwHJvl4D5qmGQjZIXVYvEbuBvPMGq9xo3Uzk+iCGGwQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=L3K0/E6ZEJodJAoNLwcLbc/rvJf+WG7swxtU45xi7fxpLgd37pJeeBz8ZDP49BOyX ugB7XV3yn0792GxNeqf0B4Qb/IZr/oHxSsQt9HPpMSXoogsnjPDkI7DCG9Ja86XSu5 tvFnjPoy+9Xti51EaWOiw0Bq33f9Ww25cQZKhLmxSwR1Wgii7jRpw0lHB2ofkbHIy+ hvYQt/cRX6poxw7TLOFqy71oALwYz669q0DnD4lH4AAMZud9bEqv0bYP1nYqxSYrzX VBhbIXu0TzIDnW1504zyEt/RIjVqhp7xxiN2l7te08f8riYzS3naP0cf8I4k13NCNm dYFlSQkl5qOaA== Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 22:24:10 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Sean Anderson Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Camelia Alexandra Groza , Madalin Bucur , Bagas Sanjaya , Rob Herring , Ioana Ciornei , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Jonathan Corbet , Li Yang , Michael Turquette , Shawn Guo , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/10] phy: Add support for Lynx 10G SerDes Message-ID: References: <20221230000139.2846763-1-sean.anderson@seco.com> <0024c780-ff9c-a9d3-8773-28e6b21bcc43@seco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0024c780-ff9c-a9d3-8773-28e6b21bcc43@seco.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230118_085418_860790_FCCCED8C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.12 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 17-01-23, 11:46, Sean Anderson wrote: > > I noticed that this series is marked "changes requested" on patchwork. > However, I have received only automated feedback. I have done my best > effort to address feedback I have received on prior revisions. I would > appreciate getting another round of review before resending this series. Looking at the series, looks like kernel-bot sent some warnings on the series so I was expecting an updated series for review -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel