From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F5CC25B4E for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:07:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1dSwHqKCuxS7e+ZHZHcWNGBfLtE7VAZfgOACL26ACb0=; b=eqAomYhJY8lT4M f6QUOLXFXYWcsgNjSuL7uNpJmETiwZmHIXu8kqw4JDcsCUeRHWNwTLPBHt1Cafii41W4p8pQ+KGl5 EbgQoTgqymM28TSZvnbtm+fCsJ5gD99tYE0cBnkhk65Ld1FsFTCEd+Znwhuy3jYCjPuaJ0SMBXRxf 87nN6NqCMwxC4bHvyhRBL2L6xYIzZG8czCUvBNd5E+7H1ucUqYf2f22sTXBXD6QBBfX2y2eHHIieT n8GATnp5BAcz7BhjUphlCsOyz/LQA48LEqRb28gbfXsUHvy+TZMVDB6TUESoSRsV/U/nUAbpUjrO4 30EaTaCCqUaFFybBwE+A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pImQC-008wUQ-Gu; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:06:48 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pImQ9-008wSw-0I; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:06:46 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 725C161E48; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04627C4339C; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 08:06:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1674202000; bh=UiIWl1B5LiUi4QWU9j9MLDN5A3wG8pwgCFhO+/VTz5k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eV82duGb2iVbYPyf0AeoQN8zV/TSECpo1KwtWHWHyFwc/G0u7ds3bXr4Gf1iaXQeW Pwwm8fnvJGoBrj/QdnGlrIfCf0QHXJCoN8pdlM5u0+kC5R4gfMB1+gvH+Uf7e5VcxI PpgA+S2NMZJoKa1IlJ7qHGY9iE/UO87bWRtgDysT3ajO7hI47onHI+5t5tL3a77ewS utwllDInmkt7v2ObVNXNxYSnf2Rfo8FVFepensvD6wTfqd0CCQbKASP7YMWYcUNvDM Anh4nz2sI09zSdiT2RBNZKM28fWrmL/ovniHJ40t+r4+UM9To1RXjxRy7uI8IVUUiK veIQLzwAP4nmA== Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 13:36:36 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Sean Anderson Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Camelia Alexandra Groza , Madalin Bucur , Bagas Sanjaya , Rob Herring , Ioana Ciornei , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Jonathan Corbet , Li Yang , Michael Turquette , Shawn Guo , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/10] phy: Add support for Lynx 10G SerDes Message-ID: References: <20221230000139.2846763-1-sean.anderson@seco.com> <0024c780-ff9c-a9d3-8773-28e6b21bcc43@seco.com> <17e428ae-7789-a1ab-3ccd-90b3b9a088f1@seco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17e428ae-7789-a1ab-3ccd-90b3b9a088f1@seco.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230120_000645_121058_8D1BAE05 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.31 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 19-01-23, 11:22, Sean Anderson wrote: > On 1/18/23 11:54, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 17-01-23, 11:46, Sean Anderson wrote: > >> > >> I noticed that this series is marked "changes requested" on patchwork. > >> However, I have received only automated feedback. I have done my best > >> effort to address feedback I have received on prior revisions. I would > >> appreciate getting another round of review before resending this series. > > > > Looking at the series, looks like kernel-bot sent some warnings on the > > series so I was expecting an updated series for review > > > > Generally, multiple reviewers will comment on a patch, even if another > reviewer finds something which needs to be changed. This is a one-line > fix, so I would appreciate getting more substantial feedback before > respinning. Every time I send a new series I have to rebase and test on > hardware. It's work that I would rather do when there is something to be > gained. I review to apply, if I can apply, I would typically skip this -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel