From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ED62C05027 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:07:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1K/atf5nPSXna85HjElaLBqq7KZ/mnRbfW2m9LgEXbE=; b=mVOEU4zjJZUZd/ CHnHAZd8kVSRlc8OX0G44s82ib2VGL8M3nAGb5nVb6YTyoLa9qIHlC36DIbzrK0E28R7j0PmHg1ia Ca185GdwhqfunigjSGCjLhiI6XxbElKRxBT6Udyp76rxkwCraaf0hd7tq4CzPUT+5liRLo/oBKPkS /gngJRbEEm39Bm/gTseEIBgY/G4QwDQKO3kQEgMxeAsm1lkSwWSfPO93XEqSWOp7lBTJpl8T3r3Sz o3q6Pwp0Jv74CnC/waPGaTNIydcRVslTyy1YsXF99meFFyi+9F1Myk2rW1tSSWeA++PYHc0uPbbf8 tHmrPY+ixedvzSpurS5A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pIoHV-009f71-4o; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:05:57 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pIo5R-009Yog-2k for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:53:31 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E460B14BF; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 01:54:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from e120937-lin (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8037D3F71A; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 01:53:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:53:14 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: Florian Fainelli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, wleavitt@marvell.com, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com, nicola.mazzucato@arm.com, tarek.el-sherbiny@arm.com, quic_kshivnan@quicinc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] Introduce a unified API for SCMI Server testing Message-ID: References: <20230118121426.492864-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230120_015329_233781_7B913F56 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.23 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:47:04PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hi Christian, > Hi Florian, > On 1/18/23 04:14, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This series aims to introduce a new SCMI unified userspace interface meant > > to ease testing an SCMI Server implementation for compliance, fuzzing etc., > > from the perspective of the OSPM agent (non-secure world only ...) > > > > It is proposed as a testing/development facility, it is NOT meant to be a > > feature to use in production, but only enabled in Kconfig for test > > deployments. > > > > Currently an SCMI Compliance Suite like the one at [1] can only work by > > injecting SCMI messages at the SCMI transport layer using the mailbox test > > driver (CONFIG_MAILBOX_TEST) via its few debugfs entries and looking at > > the related replies from the SCMI backend Server. > > Took a while but finally: > > Tested-by: Florian Fainelli > Thanks for giving it a go. > Any idea when the raw_mode_support or the acs_raw_mode_support will hit your > master branch in the scmi-tests repository? I was holding off waiting for this series to be merged to be sure the debugfs ABI was not changing anymore, so now, soon-ish, I'll move to request merge the Raw support in the ACS too; the only further delay regarding this, that I can think of, could be that I know QA is also adding v3.1 tests to the ACS and they are too going for the MR in these days, so this could delay a bit further the Raw support merge. Thanks, Cristian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel