From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D39C433E0 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58E37223DB for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:50:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 58E37223DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=y6EPhxFTr6tvUQvet0/VMbseD+CosH2QvI+b7atjwHg=; b=1tLPSkNp82PVJaO7Hqw7CbsBW rJwvPi/aQx7mvYEFWRRFOjR/TNSH0JDoywTKKEGfulsHqkCM0pD5pODeQXyuoicLAM69aCBTtX/eD p8LZW7+ZbrSzIeX+GocfVxG3JdObtad3SSRofUzivoPrNdu/e++aQjDA2ca8AZtKLbkNZuVe3qpVG PVlajiIZrqR0zd+xTrFiM4hGo+NOjpFF8KdQXIwDO8uZCfxn1VoDYTbeR0xJvxZV0zj0B8YCbGKFu OXPyxYZcFcCI4P+CFFBmQrO+qXxe9O5ytCZaorWqeyrbW2YOiCUO2FZ+3PcsOVy0h4HUoVWtQ1GUP qhCQUvoTA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2Hac-00085y-S6; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:48:19 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2HUs-0004yE-4D for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:42:23 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id u14so3571982wmq.4 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:42:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=pZAvuSzWG8A+x8RzKRjMwPsRhtgX7L+uhw4FZKkKEI8=; b=zRxQYipj+tDx+56ns7Ze3GNaWKe6r/tz7bvAXtpDr91GVvL23yfQ/xtlLzjs05uev+ 8i2EojAZz56kMZbRSsG/r1NPPpNL4NAj++u8i0kgBaNiyH69hhbSuoegPhOYLhxUauZv etfzouMcaNK5lq5RxEmqhb2PX5YGBmfeMI8RlHVmAjZZKZXXTJNZ2thv3JRabF/bMAEw J9qYUuqu3b6tTyaYVoJ5slZEJIOPOY+gxpF5WoWwq8y8+y5XcjK+GHVG/GusLGXVC5YZ iHAxGPlk2txdevnG/Gf8lL5SwtM7ZYUr/Sa4RQL2z4B1dcjM+Y+GJGW0B5+oA5F+akOT BOMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=pZAvuSzWG8A+x8RzKRjMwPsRhtgX7L+uhw4FZKkKEI8=; b=gHTBacYX+odcwndti/grC8pqWXsnyCK3ZFzqMot9SvE3AlVKcujF/uQTYhmaaFy2m+ /S2sYHcrZFlZWDtcipMNKQsu1LLfRXwABF8qlzRIKuSIPWSCmk7upn3KtBEG8doGIMPK tGb6/BIByMtTr7TDK6pXUXYttSsaAaww8buc/cXxcV6jS+PHrXqukKoArhbMqwKRvBhI 7Vm16GvlTEn5aOIMSciSQWnC0wrXjCeV7a0e6FcX8bXS8Hwfk8Cywg1O5dOqv5m9mOEF n0vb6AtXolMJ57IN23e3TCRLeF+ZUq3tHxe+oOOd9v+evYjsPUiixOgSfHPdmzjQGao6 viEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533GP5l2H4PocoioFullR/KAMIRNV2irI8aKYsJTQChka6ej6ig1 BA8UYO6mpoPs9h2DMBRoLqNGLw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYAzTiX4xwllUpQ3tEmFyP+aMrMd1eNh0vdVqNy275RfGfMG77U9ZkyVaxQJ39df7vXopr2A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2783:: with SMTP id n125mr5360381wmn.74.1611164536579; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:42:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from myrica ([2001:1715:4e26:a7e0:116c:c27a:3e7f:5eaf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q9sm5974304wme.18.2021.01.20.09.42.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:42:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:41:56 +0100 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker To: Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/10] iommu: Remove obsolete comment Message-ID: References: <20210108145217.2254447-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20210108145217.2254447-2-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20210119111144.00002130@Huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210119111144.00002130@Huawei.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210120_124222_206890_124DF39C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.35 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, vivek.gautam@arm.com, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lenb@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:11:44AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:52:09 +0100 > Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > > Commit 986d5ecc5699 ("iommu: Move fwspec->iommu_priv to struct > > dev_iommu") removed iommu_priv from fwspec. Update the struct doc. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker > Hi Jean-Philippe, > > Flags parameter doesn't have any docs in this structure and should > do given kernel-doc should be complete. It probably spits out a warning > for this if you build with W=1 Ah right, I had a patch removing the flags field locally, but I'm not planning to upstream that one anymore. I don't mind fixing up the comment in next version. Thanks, Jean > > Not sure if it makes sense to fix that in this same patch, or as a different > one as the responsible patch is a different one. > Looks like that came in: > Commit 5702ee24182f ("ACPI/IORT: Check ATS capability in root complex nodes") > > Also, good to get this patch merged asap so we cut down on the noise in the > interesting part of this series! > > FWIW > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron > > Jonathan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel