Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] perf cs-etm: Fix bitmap for option

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Kiss <Daniel.Kiss@arm.com>,
	Denis Nikitin <denik@chromium.org>, Al Grant <al.grant@arm.com>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] perf cs-etm: Fix bitmap for option
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:29:44 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEJqiNkIsNWS0E2G@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210209015855.GA54680@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>

Em Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:58:55AM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 01:46:41PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 11:08:29PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> > > 
> > > When set option with macros ETM_OPT_CTXTID and ETM_OPT_TS, it wrongly
> > > takes these two values (14 and 28 prespectively) as bit masks, but
> > > actually both are the offset for bits.  But this doesn't lead to
> > > further failure due to the AND logic operation will be always true for
> > > ETM_OPT_CTXTID / ETM_OPT_TS.
> > > 
> > > This patch defines new independent macros (rather than using the
> > > "config" bits) for requesting the "contextid" and "timestamp" for
> > > cs_etm_set_option().
> > > 
> > > [leoy: Extract the change as a separate patch for easier review]
> > 
> > This should go just above your name - see below.

I fixed this up and added this patch to my perf/urgent branch, for
v5.12, since the kernel bits are upstream and this is a fix.

Looking at the other patches in the series.

- Arnaldo

> > > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
> > 
> >  Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> >  [Extract the change as a separate patch for easier review]
> >  Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> >  Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
> > 
> > > ---
> > >  tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> > > index bd446aba64f7..c25c878fd06c 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> > > @@ -156,6 +156,10 @@ static int cs_etm_set_timestamp(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> > >  	return err;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +#define ETM_SET_OPT_CTXTID	(1 << 0)
> > > +#define ETM_SET_OPT_TS		(1 << 1)
> > > +#define ETM_SET_OPT_MASK	(ETM_SET_OPT_CTXTID | ETM_SET_OPT_TS)
> > > +
> > 
> > I would much rather see this fixed with the BIT() macro as it is done in the
> > rest of this set than defining new constant.
> > 
> > With the above:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > 
> > I have picked up the kernel portion of this set.  I suggest you fix the above
> > and send another revision to Arnaldo with my RBs.
> 
> Will do this.  Thanks for suggestion, Mathieu.
> 
> Leo
> 
> [...]

-- 

- Arnaldo

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel